Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools

Trace: • imagerteleconnotes20171114 • teleconsnotes20171213
20180919_aps_sevem

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
20180919_aps_sevem [2018/10/22 03:23] – grocha20180919_aps_sevem [2018/10/25 05:38] (current) – grocha
Line 17: Line 17:
 - added the BandPowers for Sevem maps at 62GHz, case17 (90.00) for full-sky - to investigate the lack of BB power in the cut-sky case (with mask not apodised). - added the BandPowers for Sevem maps at 62GHz, case17 (90.00) for full-sky - to investigate the lack of BB power in the cut-sky case (with mask not apodised).
  
 +{{font color|red|Updates (on October 24th, 2018)}} \\
 +added the BandPowers for Sevem maps at 62GHz, case17 (90.00) for apodized mask - to investigate the lack of BB power in the cut-sky case with a mask not apodised.
 +
 +{{font color|red|Updates (on October 25th, 2018)}} \\
 +added the Bandpowers for the combined map, combined_90_108_129_155, Model 90, for 2 apodized masks and one non-apodized mask. The BB-spectra exhibits a lack of power at low-ell, for all masks. This is currently being investigated.
 ----- -----
  
Line 112: Line 117:
  
 ---- ----
-====Test case for full-sky, Case 90.00, 62GHz ====+====Test case for full-sky, 62GHz - case 90.00 ====
  
 == Full-sky 62GHz case 90.00 lmax=1000== == Full-sky 62GHz case 90.00 lmax=1000==
Line 120: Line 125:
 As shown: in the full-sky case the BB bandpowers recover well the BB input spectra. This suggests the lack of power for the cut-sky is caused by the (non-apodized) mask.  As shown: in the full-sky case the BB bandpowers recover well the BB input spectra. This suggests the lack of power for the cut-sky is caused by the (non-apodized) mask. 
  
-- Next: compare to the BP estimated when an apodized mask is applied to the maps. +Next: estimation the BP for anodized mask
  
  
Line 151: Line 155:
 || || || || || ||
  
 +----
  
 +====Test case for apodized mask, 62GHz - case 90.00 ====
 +
 +==Apodized mask, 62GHz case 90.00 lmax=1000==
 +
 +Sevem Bandpowers for case17, 62Ghz, with apodized mask (dark blue data points), vs the input model (solid orange line) for lmax=1000, and full-sky (light blue data points) and non apodized mask (black data points).
 +
 +As shown: The BB bandpowers still exhibit deficit of power at low -ell. This seems to indicate that the mask is not the source of the problem. Note that the same mask kernel is applied to the other frequencies (plots above) which do not show deficit, in fact the input BB spectra is recovered well - this indicates that the kernel should be fine. On the other hand the full-sky case recovers well the input BB spectra indicating that the inputs should be fine as well (ie no mis-estimation of the noise or something else going on here) - hence it is unclear what is causing this lack power. I am currently investigating this and checking the iterations and convergence.
 +
 +
 +||border=1, width=1400, align=center
 +|| **TT** || **TE** ||
 +||{{sevem_62_TT_all_l1000.png?700}}||{{sevem_62_TE_all_l1000.png?700}}||
 +|| || ||
 +
 +||border=1, width=1400, align=center
 +|| **EE** || **BB**||
 +||{{sevem_62_EE_all_l1000.png?700}}||{{sevem_62_BB_all_l1000.png?700}}||
 +|| || ||
 +
 +----
 +
 +==Apodized mask, 62GHz case 90.00 lmax=300==
 +
 +Sevem Bandpowers for case17, 62Ghz, with apodized mask (dark blue data points), vs the input model (solid orange line) for lmax=300, and full-sky (light blue data points) and non apodized mask (black data points).
 +
 +
 +
 +||border=1, width=1400, align=center
 +|| **TT** || **TE** ||
 +||{{sevem_62_TT_all_l300.png?700}}||{{sevem_62_TE_all_l300.png?700}}||
 +|| || ||
 +
 +||border=1, width=1400, align=center
 +|| **EE** || **BB**||
 +||{{sevem_62_EE_all_l300.png?700}}||{{sevem_62_BB_all_l300.png?700}}||
 +|| || ||
 +
 +----
 +
 +
 +==== Combined map - case 90.00 ====
 +
 +Sevem Bandpowers for the map combined_90_108_129_155, vs the input model (solid orange line) for lmax=1000
 +
 +inputs in dir: /project/projectdirs/pico/reanalysis/compsepmaps/sevem_04.00_181011/MODEL90.91/\\
 +
 +data: data_combined_90_108_129_155_fwf15.0d0.fits \\
 +noise: noise_combined_90_108_129_155_fwf15.0d0.fits\\
 +
 +masks: /project/projectdirs/pico/reanalysis/compsepmaps/sevem_04.00_180815/\\
 +mask0.15_pol_sm7deg_nu0p45_up512_sm7deg_nu0p57_apocos5pix.fits - maskapo\\
 +mask0.15_pol_sm7deg_nu0p45_up512_apocos5pix.fits - maskapo_v1\\
 +mask0.15_pol_sm7deg_nu0p45_up512.fits - mask\\
 +
 +
 +While all spectra is recovered reasonably well for all masks, BB spectra exhibits lack of power at low-ell for both apodized and non-apodized masks. This is currently being investigated.
 +
 +
 +||border=1, width=1400, align=center
 +|| **TT** || **TE** ||
 +||{{sevem_m90_TT_all_l1000.png?700}}||{{sevem_m90_TE_all_l1000.png?700}}||
 +|| || ||
 +
 +||border=1, width=1400, align=center
 +|| **EE** || **BB**||
 +||{{sevem_m90_EE_all_l1000.png?700}}||{{sevem_m90_BB_all_l1000.png?700}}||
 +|| || ||
  
  
Line 162: Line 234:
 ---- ----
  
-==== NILC ====+===== NILC =====
  
 Problem shown in the plots below - trying to understand whether the issue is in the component separation step or misinterpretation of the inputs for bandPower estimation. Problem shown in the plots below - trying to understand whether the issue is in the component separation step or misinterpretation of the inputs for bandPower estimation.
Line 272: Line 344:
 ||{{bfmr_input_l7000.png?350}}||{{bfmr_input_l100.png?350}}|| ||{{bfmr_input_l7000.png?350}}||{{bfmr_input_l100.png?350}}||
 || || || || || ||
 +
 +
  
  
20180919_aps_sevem.1540196636.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/10/22 03:23 by grocha

Page Tools