==== Agenda ====

  * Discuss which systematics to simulate and parametrization
  * How to assess validity of 1/f noise values?
  * [[https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yVAmQFK-bjenhiRa_EeJqsB29-EiPNk2-JQBh2TSXvo/edit?usp=sharing | Google Doc with parameters]]

==== Minutes ====

  * Actions:  Andrea implementing c) i) for PICO. After that we can decide if need gain variation.
  * Brendan: Ask thermal engineer at JPL to get estimates on thermal variations in the intrument? Is there also possibility of estimating polarized emission and IP from the optics?
  * <del>Action Item [Joy]: how are the maps with systematics going to be evaluated?</del> 
    * Shaul first wants effect to be evaluated on only CMB + noise, no lensing or foregrounds. 
    * Josquin could take in maps with systematics and run them through pipeline including foreground separation and estimate sigma_r
  * Action Item [Graca]: email Lloyd to ask about data challenge pipeline
  * Action Item [Brendan]: What is the scope of Brad’s work with GRASP?
  * <del>Action Item [Joy]: Talk to Shaul and get readout / detector noise estimates for PICO</del>
    * Shaul agrees readout noise shouldn't dominate
    * Brendan's email exchange with Roger seems enough to use 10 mHz estimate for f_knee
  * <del>Action Item [Brendan]: Get estimate on polarization angle calibration from Planck</del>