Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools

Trace: • calibration_simulations
calibration_simulations

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
calibration_simulations [2018/10/10 04:45] – mauriziotomasicalibration_simulations [2019/02/20 04:56] (current) – Put an "outdated" warning message at the top of the page. mauriziotomasi
Line 1: Line 1:
 +**This page contains outdated information**. Refer to the report «Simulating dipole calibration for PICO», by Maurizio Tomasi, for the most up-to-date information {{::tomasi-calibration-note.pdf|}}.
 +
 ====== Calibration simulations ====== ====== Calibration simulations ======
  
Line 185: Line 187:
 The differenced maps produced in the two cases are quite different: The differenced maps produced in the two cases are quite different:
  
-<IMAGE HERE>+{{ :systematicswg:cal_error_maps.png?600 |}}
  
 Of course, the scale of the effect considers the presence of two Of course, the scale of the effect considers the presence of two
Line 191: Line 193:
  
 Computing the BB spectrum of the map in the two cases and confronting Computing the BB spectrum of the map in the two cases and confronting
-it with the input map shows the scale of the effect:+it with the input map shows the scale of the effect (as well as two 
 +power spectra assuming only tensor modes, provided as a reference):
  
-<IMAGE HERE>+{{ :systematicswg:calibration_spectrum_bb.png?600 |}}
  
 In order to produce this plot, I rescaled the spectrum by 2/N, where In order to produce this plot, I rescaled the spectrum by 2/N, where
-N is the number of W-band detectors in the focal plane of PICO: this+N is the number of W-band bolometers in the focal plane of PICO, and 
 +then I performed a NET-weighted average over all the cosmology bands 
 +from 60 GHz (band 7) to 220 GHz (band 22): this
 assumes that the gain fluctuations are negligibly correlated among assumes that the gain fluctuations are negligibly correlated among
 detectors. This is the case for the case with realistic noise, but not detectors. This is the case for the case with realistic noise, but not
Line 203: Line 208:
 and 0B: and 0B:
  
-<IMAGE HERE>+{{ :systematicswg:gain_timeline.png?600 |}}
  
calibration_simulations.1539164705.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/10/10 04:45 by mauriziotomasi

Page Tools