Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| calibration_simulations [2018/10/10 04:58] – Add a few images mauriziotomasi | calibration_simulations [2019/02/20 04:56] (current) – Put an "outdated" warning message at the top of the page. mauriziotomasi | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | **This page contains outdated information**. Refer to the report «Simulating dipole calibration for PICO», by Maurizio Tomasi, for the most up-to-date information {{:: | ||
| + | |||
| ====== Calibration simulations ====== | ====== Calibration simulations ====== | ||
| Line 191: | Line 193: | ||
| Computing the BB spectrum of the map in the two cases and confronting | Computing the BB spectrum of the map in the two cases and confronting | ||
| - | it with the input map shows the scale of the effect: | + | it with the input map shows the scale of the effect |
| + | power spectra assuming only tensor modes, provided as a reference): | ||
| {{ : | {{ : | ||
| In order to produce this plot, I rescaled the spectrum by 2/N, where | In order to produce this plot, I rescaled the spectrum by 2/N, where | ||
| - | N is the number of W-band | + | N is the number of W-band |
| + | then I performed a NET-weighted average over all the cosmology bands | ||
| + | from 60 GHz (band 7) to 220 GHz (band 22): this | ||
| assumes that the gain fluctuations are negligibly correlated among | assumes that the gain fluctuations are negligibly correlated among | ||
| detectors. This is the case for the case with realistic noise, but not | detectors. This is the case for the case with realistic noise, but not | ||