Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- feb._21_2017 [2018/02/21 08:34] – created nbatta
+++ feb._21_2017 [2018/02/21 09:53] (current) – nbatta
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Feb 21 2018
+__Feb 21 2018__
+Attendees: Alex, Sebastian, Gianfranco, Jean-Baptiste, Nick, Jim
+Agenda:
+  Imager v3 design updates (V3 located under imager options
+  Frequency Bands and Noise: Specifications to Use)
+  Lensing forecasts
+{{::cmbprobe_lensingnoise_v3.pdf|CMB lensing update}}
+  Cluster forecasts
+With optical WL mass calibration with CV tau
+clusters 140k
+Mnu 1-sigma : 10.8 meV
+w0 1-sigma : 2.29 %
+wa 1-sigma : 13 %
+  Any other forecast updates
+Jean-Baptiste will post something soon regarding dust contamination.
+  Preparation for the May workshop: preliminary schedule
+  How to sharpen the extragalactic science case, in preparation for the report
+  (what are the up coming milestones)
+  Additionally, we should consider what S3 or S4 + PICO joint analyses to highlight
+  (possibly write papers)
+  Cadence for telecons
+  AOB
+__Minutes__
+-Very impressive lensing and cluster forecasts with the new v3 specs.
+-Need to include foreground cleaning for lensing, how does the lensing S/N degrade once we remove foregrounds.
+-Carry CMB lensing S/N through to parameters
+-For clusters consider lack of full-sky optical survey (LSST)
+-Consider correlated dust contamination, which Jean-Baptiste has started with v2, just needs to make plots and will ask Matthieu for v3 maps
+-Extragalactic sources, Matthieu maps are crashing the source extraction codes. Jean-Baptiste suggests running on a cluster and use small patches. Or we ask Matthieu to produce small patches. This is work carried out by Marco and Diego.
+-There are potential topics to spin off into their own papers, or a white paper on extragalactic science with pico.
+-Every 2 weeks for telecons!

User Tools

Differences

Page Tools