Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
foregroundstelecon20200709 [2020/07/09 12:37] – hanany | foregroundstelecon20200709 [2020/11/01 20:50] (current) – hanany | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
- | [[https:// | + | [[https://spa-zzz-01.spa.umn.edu/!ipsig/ |
[[https:// | [[https:// | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* "r non-zero values": | * "r non-zero values": | ||
* Raphael suggests r=0.003, and r=5e-4. Why? good for doing cross-checks. **Action: SH will check whether there are other prevailing opinions.** | * Raphael suggests r=0.003, and r=5e-4. Why? good for doing cross-checks. **Action: SH will check whether there are other prevailing opinions.** | ||
- | * Clem reminds us that Hans-Kristian requested some changes to simulations: | + | * Clem reminds us that Hans-Kristian requested some changes to simulations: |
- | * Ragnhild reports on her work with Commander1 (**need to get slides**). She observes excess power and is investigating the source. | + | * Ragnhild reports on her work with Commander1 ({{:: |
* Clem suggests running the simulations on the 00 model, which has Gaussian distributed foregrounds, | * Clem suggests running the simulations on the 00 model, which has Gaussian distributed foregrounds, | ||
* Brief discussion of Mathieu' | * Brief discussion of Mathieu' | ||
+ | * Mathieu and SH discuss the r likelihood plots (see slides from two weeks ago). Since r=0 in the input, the peak of the likelihood indicates the level of residuals; the width indicates instrument noise, and remaining lensing variance. MR says he fixes A_lens to be 15%, as if we know the value with no uncertainty. MR and SH agree that (1) either A_lens should be fit together with r, or (2) some uncertainty in the value of A_lens needs to be folded in when estimate the likelihood for r. | ||