Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools

Trace:
foregroundstelecon20200903

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
foregroundstelecon20200903 [2020/09/17 09:56] – hananyforegroundstelecon20200903 [2020/11/01 20:51] (current) – hanany
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Telecon Notes Sept. 3 2020 ====== ====== Telecon Notes Sept. 3 2020 ======
  
-[[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/foregrounds|Link to main foregrounds telecons page]] \\+[[https://spa-zzz-01.spa.umn.edu/!ipsig/foregrounds|Link to main foregrounds telecons page]] \\
 [[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/logbook|Link to logbook]] [[https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/logbook|Link to logbook]]
  
Line 11: Line 11:
   * Ragnhild shares {{::20200903_commander_pico.pdf|a new set of slides}}.    * Ragnhild shares {{::20200903_commander_pico.pdf|a new set of slides}}. 
     * She is working with 90.91, r=0 and r=1e-3.      * She is working with 90.91, r=0 and r=1e-3. 
-    * Slide 3: r=0.003 (note typo), CMB maps are much cleaner compared to last week. This is due to tweaking parameters of underlying foreground model. (compare to slide 3 of two weeks ago.) +    * Slide 3: r=0.003 (note typo), CMB map is much cleaner compared to last week. This is due to tweaking parameters of underlying foreground model. (compare to slide 3 of two weeks ago.) 
     * comparison of Slides 4,5 shows that dust temperature is reconstructed well. PICO is very good in extracting dust temperature. Not clear what's happening with dust amplitude. Is it a different color scale or really amplitude not reconstructed well?      * comparison of Slides 4,5 shows that dust temperature is reconstructed well. PICO is very good in extracting dust temperature. Not clear what's happening with dust amplitude. Is it a different color scale or really amplitude not reconstructed well? 
     * Slides 6-9 comparison of reconstruction of other foreground parameters     * Slides 6-9 comparison of reconstruction of other foreground parameters
Line 22: Line 22:
     * Use various cuts of data (bands, sky coverage) to show robustness of results, and absence of such robustness with less available bands, or higher noise that prevents mission cuts.      * Use various cuts of data (bands, sky coverage) to show robustness of results, and absence of such robustness with less available bands, or higher noise that prevents mission cuts. 
     * For realizations: use N=10 for now. The expectation is that variance due to statistics would be small compared to variance coming from different sky models. No point getting the variance due to statistics determined to too high precision.       * For realizations: use N=10 for now. The expectation is that variance due to statistics would be small compared to variance coming from different sky models. No point getting the variance due to statistics determined to too high precision.  
 +    * 
foregroundstelecon20200903.1600354563.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/09/17 09:56 by hanany

Page Tools