Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki
foregroundstelecon20200917

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
foregroundstelecon20200917 [2020/11/01 20:49] hananyforegroundstelecon20200917 [2020/11/02 08:03] (current) hanany
Line 9: Line 9:
 Notes: Shaul \\ Notes: Shaul \\
  
-  * Ragnhild shares a new set of slides +  * {{ :20200917_commander_pico.pdf |Ragnhild shares a new set of slides }}
     * slide 1: starts with 90.91, not fitting for synchrotron curvature (because it isn't in the sky; more on that later)     * slide 1: starts with 90.91, not fitting for synchrotron curvature (because it isn't in the sky; more on that later)
     * 2,3: Finds the best fit model; residual in many bands look very reasonable.      * 2,3: Finds the best fit model; residual in many bands look very reasonable. 
foregroundstelecon20200917.1604285393.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/11/01 20:49 by hanany