Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki
foregroundstelecon20201112

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
foregroundstelecon20201112 [2020/12/10 09:44] hananyforegroundstelecon20201112 [2020/12/10 09:45] (current) hanany
Line 12: Line 12:
  
   * {{ ::nilc_cmilc_pico_12nov2020.pdf |MR shows recent results}}   * {{ ::nilc_cmilc_pico_12nov2020.pdf |MR shows recent results}}
-  * Reminder: 90.91 is Planck state-of-the-art; 90.92 has the Finkbeiner two dust model +    * Reminder: 90.91 is Planck state-of-the-art; 90.92 has the Finkbeiner two dust model 
-  * Slide 3: complete r=0 and r=0.003 for both models, 10 realizations each +    * Slide 3: complete r=0 and r=0.003 for both models, 10 realizations each 
-  * Slides 4,5: 90.92 residual are a bit lower than 90.91, why?  +    * Slides 4,5: 90.92 residual are a bit lower than 90.91, why?  
-  * Same for slides 12, 13+    * Same for slides 12, 13 
 +    * Next steps: remove bands? More models?  
 +  * JD suggest making an outline for the paper
  
foregroundstelecon20201112.1607615071.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/12/10 09:44 by hanany