Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


foregroundstelecon20201112

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
foregroundstelecon20201112 [2020/12/10 09:44] hananyforegroundstelecon20201112 [2020/12/10 09:45] (current) hanany
Line 12: Line 12:
  
   * {{ ::nilc_cmilc_pico_12nov2020.pdf |MR shows recent results}}   * {{ ::nilc_cmilc_pico_12nov2020.pdf |MR shows recent results}}
-  * Reminder: 90.91 is Planck state-of-the-art; 90.92 has the Finkbeiner two dust model +    * Reminder: 90.91 is Planck state-of-the-art; 90.92 has the Finkbeiner two dust model 
-  * Slide 3: complete r=0 and r=0.003 for both models, 10 realizations each +    * Slide 3: complete r=0 and r=0.003 for both models, 10 realizations each 
-  * Slides 4,5: 90.92 residual are a bit lower than 90.91, why?  +    * Slides 4,5: 90.92 residual are a bit lower than 90.91, why?  
-  * Same for slides 12, 13+    * Same for slides 12, 13 
 +    * Next steps: remove bands? More models?  
 +  * JD suggest making an outline for the paper
  
foregroundstelecon20201112.1607615071.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/12/10 09:44 by hanany