Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools

Trace:
foregroundstelecon20210204

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
foregroundstelecon20210204 [2021/02/17 22:04] – hananyforegroundstelecon20210204 [2021/02/17 22:41] (current) – hanany
Line 22: Line 22:
     * Also, this conclusion ("would not have led to bias") is true for the PICO noise level. May not be true at other noise levels.      * Also, this conclusion ("would not have led to bias") is true for the PICO noise level. May not be true at other noise levels. 
     * **Action Item: Redo analysis removing only high or only low frequency bands**.      * **Action Item: Redo analysis removing only high or only low frequency bands**. 
-  * {{ :20210203_commander_pico.pdf |Commander Update}}+  *  {{ :20210203_commander_pico.pdf |Discussing Ragnhild's report}} 
 +    * In trying to optimize the mask RA finds varying level's of r depending on the mask (model 90.91, with r=0) 
 +    * Generally finding aliasing of power: the resolution of the maps is coarser than the PICO beam.  
 +    * **Action: Uni is producing in-house simulations to check that this is indeed the issue** 
foregroundstelecon20210204.1613621079.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/02/17 22:04 by hanany

Page Tools