Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- foregroundstelecon20211013 [2021/10/20 22:24] – hanany
+++ foregroundstelecon20211013 [2021/10/20 22:37] (current) – hanany
@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
       * same as above
-  * Charles gives outline for gap list paper.
+  * Charles gives outline for gap list paper (see below). SH: there is a specific form that needs to be filled. We need to highlight urgency, such as 'critical', or 'mission enhancing'. Perhaps 10-20 GHz would be 'mission enhancing'; do we know we can call it critical?
+Hi Shaul & Co.:
+As promised, here's a draft outline of the case for broadening the frequency range of the tech gap list on CMB detectors.
+. Intro
+    statement of what we're writing about.  Overview or argument.  Context of space CMB mission science requirements.
+. high frequency (now 600, we'll argue to raise to 800)
+    results of simulations, showing the improvement in CMB extraction with the addition of frequencies between 600 and 800 GHz
+    at least one figure.  What's the best one to use?
+. low frequency (now 30, we'll argue to lower to 10)
+    "practical" argument from Oslo about SNR and real estate
+    if we have any simulation results that seem relevant, we'll use them, otherwise say that we don't yet.
+. summary
+Charles