Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


foregroundstelecon20211020

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
foregroundstelecon20211020 [2021/10/20 22:42] hananyforegroundstelecon20211020 [2021/10/27 19:47] (current) hanany
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Telecon Notes Oct. 20, 2021 ======+====== Telecon Notes Oct. 21, 2021 ======
  
 [[https://spa-zzz-01.spa.umn.edu/!ipsig/foregrounds|Link to main foregrounds telecons page]] \\ [[https://spa-zzz-01.spa.umn.edu/!ipsig/foregrounds|Link to main foregrounds telecons page]] \\
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 === Notes: === === Notes: ===
 +
 +  * Parametric update - Ragnhild is working on finding the right mask for the infilling in model 90.91. 
 +    * When she fits she gets good fits over the full sky including the Galactic plane. Then she masks, but the power spectra after infilling the mask don't agree with the input. Why is she getting good chi^2 before cutting the sky, but poor power spectra after in-filling? 
 +    * Question: why not estimate spectra on cut sky? Because of EB leakage affects the B-mode spectra. 
 +    * Question: does the problem exist only with Foregrounds? No, same problem with/out foregrounds, indicating that something is broken in the code. 
 +    * Suggestion: perhaps use MASTER for power spectrum estimation, not Anafast? 
 +  * Delensing: Julien is not present
 +    * Discussion revolves back to Clem's maps. JD: the B-delenser uses E + map of potential (phi) to estimate the underlying B. Where do we get \phi? from EB and TB correlations. So although the foreground may not affect E and could affect the EB and TB correlations.  
  
foregroundstelecon20211020.1634787771.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/10/20 22:42 by hanany