Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


foregroundstelecon20220217

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
foregroundstelecon20220217 [2022/02/17 09:43] – created hananyforegroundstelecon20220217 [2022/02/21 16:27] (current) hanany
Line 8: Line 8:
 Regrets:  Regrets: 
  
-=== Agenda: ===+=== Agenda + Notes: ===
  
   * Commander - Low \ell likelihood   * Commander - Low \ell likelihood
 +    * {{::galloway_20220217_r_curv_0.0.png?25|}} 
 +    * {{::galloway_20220217_r_curv_0.0030.png?25|}}
 +    * Matthew show two simulations (above) one for r=0 and another for r=0.003, comparing the Gaussian likelihood to the correct low-ell approximation. The likelihood is only calculated for \ell 2-12; full sky, no masking or sky fraction. Not delensed. For next week: extend \ell range to \ell=200, and masked sky.  
   * NILC - small patch analysis   * NILC - small patch analysis
 +    * {{::jd_20220217_patchy-sky.png?25|}}
 +    * Jacques produced patches for MR. Code sent. MR will compute r in each patch. 
   * Delensing - include material in paper   * Delensing - include material in paper
 +    * {{ ::nilc_pico_20220217.pdf |r likelihood with real delensing noise }}
 +    * MR took the real delensing noise and injected it into his r-estimate for r=0 and finds an essentially identical result. Julien suggest doing the same with r=0.003, but MR argues we should again be reproducing his calculations. 
 +
  
-=== Notes: === 
  
foregroundstelecon20220217.1645112620.txt.gz · Last modified: 2022/02/17 09:43 by hanany