Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| foregroundstelecon20220217 [2022/02/21 16:18] – hanany | foregroundstelecon20220217 [2022/02/21 16:27] (current) – hanany | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| Regrets: | Regrets: | ||
| - | === Agenda: === | + | === Agenda |
| * Commander - Low \ell likelihood | * Commander - Low \ell likelihood | ||
| * {{:: | * {{:: | ||
| * {{:: | * {{:: | ||
| + | * Matthew show two simulations (above) one for r=0 and another for r=0.003, comparing the Gaussian likelihood to the correct low-ell approximation. The likelihood is only calculated for \ell 2-12; full sky, no masking or sky fraction. Not delensed. For next week: extend \ell range to \ell=200, and masked sky. | ||
| * NILC - small patch analysis | * NILC - small patch analysis | ||
| + | * {{:: | ||
| + | * Jacques produced patches for MR. Code sent. MR will compute r in each patch. | ||
| * Delensing - include material in paper | * Delensing - include material in paper | ||
| + | * {{ :: | ||
| + | * MR took the real delensing noise and injected it into his r-estimate for r=0 and finds an essentially identical result. Julien suggest doing the same with r=0.003, but MR argues we should again be reproducing his calculations. | ||
| + | |||
| - | === Notes: === | ||