Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki
imagerteleconnotes20180214

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
imagerteleconnotes20180214 [2018/02/21 12:35] wenxx181imagerteleconnotes20180214 [2018/02/21 12:38] (current) wenxx181
Line 45: Line 45:
       * we are assuming engineering achieving nominal, by 1 arcmin in 3 sigma error per spin.       * we are assuming engineering achieving nominal, by 1 arcmin in 3 sigma error per spin.
    
 +  * Point reconstruction
 +    * alignment of instrument FOV with reference of spacecraft. change should not be faster than calibration
 +    * Jacques: we need to do simulation to get final number for point reconstruction
 +    * Shaul: 1’’ will be driven by systematics. We will see if 1’’ is reasonable given r value.
 +    * Amy: too loose, worse systematics; too tight, expensive to engineering.
  
  
imagerteleconnotes20180214.1519238144.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/02/21 12:35 by wenxx181