Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


imagerteleconnotes20180214

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
imagerteleconnotes20180214 [2018/02/21 12:35] wenxx181imagerteleconnotes20180214 [2018/02/21 12:38] (current) wenxx181
Line 45: Line 45:
       * we are assuming engineering achieving nominal, by 1 arcmin in 3 sigma error per spin.       * we are assuming engineering achieving nominal, by 1 arcmin in 3 sigma error per spin.
    
 +  * Point reconstruction
 +    * alignment of instrument FOV with reference of spacecraft. change should not be faster than calibration
 +    * Jacques: we need to do simulation to get final number for point reconstruction
 +    * Shaul: 1’’ will be driven by systematics. We will see if 1’’ is reasonable given r value.
 +    * Amy: too loose, worse systematics; too tight, expensive to engineering.
  
  
imagerteleconnotes20180214.1519238144.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/02/21 12:35 by wenxx181