Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| imagerteleconnotes20180411 [2018/04/11 23:42] – wenxx181 | imagerteleconnotes20180411 [2018/04/11 23:54] (current) – wenxx181 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
| * Jeff: we suggested for TeamX based on data we have, progress of tests one should do. We have a lot qualitative understandings, | * Jeff: we suggested for TeamX based on data we have, progress of tests one should do. We have a lot qualitative understandings, | ||
| * Time-domain simulation can predict something sensible. | * Time-domain simulation can predict something sensible. | ||
| - | * | + | * cosmic rays: |
| + | * for Planck, two problems: | ||
| + | * 1)high rate | ||
| + | * due to hitting not just the bolo but entire silicon | ||
| + | * thermal issue, can be addressed | ||
| + | * 2)long duration, high time constant | ||
| + | * not 100% understood, related to heat capacity. | ||
| + | * we can use data from Planck and SPIDER | ||
| + | * testable | ||
| + | * The combination of both makes it problematic. | ||
| + | * "Would you reduce to the level that your Low-l measurement is not affected?", | ||
| + | * People who do simulation should be able to help, e.g. Brandon, HFI simulation. | ||
| + | * 1/f. We have some simulation from CORE, 1/f knees, we can estimate impacts on low-l are. | ||
| + | * ADR + Temperature stability | ||
| + | * summarize the discussion between Brandon and Shaul | ||
| + | * ADR is not going be a driver, fluctuation is not going to be a driver in overall focal plane temperature stability | ||
| + | |||
| + | * SPIE papers | ||
| + | * prepare 1 week for comments | ||
| + | * It would be good to have outlines for the SPIE papers. | ||
| + | |||