Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| imagerteleconnotes20180509 [2018/05/10 14:19] – wenxx181 | imagerteleconnotes20180509 [2018/05/10 14:19] (current) – wenxx181 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| * temperature stability of ADR, Hannes asked to what extend spikes of T affect responsivity | * temperature stability of ADR, Hannes asked to what extend spikes of T affect responsivity | ||
| * we know the magnitude of T spikes; should be straightforward | * we know the magnitude of T spikes; should be straightforward | ||
| - | * we don’t have complete cryogenic model, temperature loading is AI for Shaul and jPL | + | * we don’t have complete cryogenic model, temperature loading is **AI for Shaul and jPL** |
| * Precession | * Precession | ||
| * Jacques proposed slow precession; because the scan by scan is closer together, you can make full sky; harder to make continuous map with fast precession | * Jacques proposed slow precession; because the scan by scan is closer together, you can make full sky; harder to make continuous map with fast precession | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| * basically FDM is higher by 2-3% level. | * basically FDM is higher by 2-3% level. | ||
| * Toki: readout noise is function of bolo normal resistance; TDM ~10 ohms, FDM ~1 ohm; TDM higher because it needs to compensate high current noise | * Toki: readout noise is function of bolo normal resistance; TDM ~10 ohms, FDM ~1 ohm; TDM higher because it needs to compensate high current noise | ||
| - | * Conclusion: same. the numbers we had from FDM are fine. | + | |