Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| imagerteleconnotes20180516 [2018/05/16 15:42] – wenxx181 | imagerteleconnotes20180516 [2018/05/16 15:49] (current) – wenxx181 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| * Kris argues that either option is good at some locations; we need to specify science goals before we really answer this question. Also, since we are using action-wheels, | * Kris argues that either option is good at some locations; we need to specify science goals before we really answer this question. Also, since we are using action-wheels, | ||
| * Jacque argues that we need to compare gap size with beam size. 48 hours comes from CORE study, which has 2-min spin rate and 96-hour precession. | * Jacque argues that we need to compare gap size with beam size. 48 hours comes from CORE study, which has 2-min spin rate and 96-hour precession. | ||
| - | * | + | * conclusion: the report should probably say “there are a range of considerations, |
| + | * Shaul: the fly-wheel will be able to do the change of precession; slow-motion can also be done. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Noise Requirements vs Best Case Estimate (BCE) | ||
| + | * Best case estimate: not everything is most optimistic, just reasonable. | ||
| + | * Shaul proposed BEC/ | ||
| + | * root 2 is coming from Planck, which had achieved within 20% BCE. | ||
| + | * 0.9 is 90% yield of pixels; BCE is optimistic on 100%-yield assumption | ||
| + | * This number is for feedback loop to science teams. | ||
| + | * Jacques: CORE did something similar, no major impacts on science | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Noise/Bands Figure | ||
| + | * goal: a standard visual | ||
| + | * needs to clarify things, needs suggestions | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||