Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| oct._11_2017 [2017/10/11 09:10] – nbatta | oct._11_2017 [2017/10/11 10:39] (current) – nbatta | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| __Oct. 11 2017__ | __Oct. 11 2017__ | ||
| - | Attendees: Gianfranco, Sebastian, Shaul, Marcelo, Jim, Colin, Nick | + | Attendees: Gianfranco, Sebastian, Shaul, Marcelo, Jim, Colin, Alex, Nick |
| Agenda: | Agenda: | ||
| - | Exgal sim updates: | + | |
| + | Exgal sim updates | ||
| CMB halo lensing (Jim and Jean-Batiste) | CMB halo lensing (Jim and Jean-Batiste) | ||
| + | https:// | ||
| New Imager specs (Shaul) | New Imager specs (Shaul) | ||
| - | WG Update | + | WG Update |
| https:// | https:// | ||
| + | __Minutes__ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marcelo | ||
| + | |||
| + | Exgal simulated maps update (Marcelo). | ||
| + | Peak patch method paper to come out soon , Fast but memory intensive | ||
| + | 1/8 of sky out to z = 4.5, without repeats | ||
| + | Sims on NERSC Please add link/path | ||
| + | CIB is now in for 60 different band passes (with CMB probe bands please check!) | ||
| + | Lensing, SZ also included | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should we include neutrinos? | ||
| + | Including variance into the gas profiles? | ||
| + | Secondary Affects | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action item: | ||
| + | Please check the bands for Probe | ||
| + | Maps of each component | ||
| + | |||
| + | Jim | ||
| + | |||
| + | CMB halo lensing forecast for 4 arcminute beam and noise 1 muK - arcmin | ||
| + | EB is not sensitive to resolution, TT is, so going to smaller aperture help reduce the noise in the TT | ||
| + | Almost as good as CMB-S4 EB is actually very similar. | ||
| + | |||
| + | How did you choose the Beam size? | ||
| + | -Pulled out of the air. We need an actually calculation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Action items: | ||
| + | Colin will produce foreground cleaned noise spectra for the lens-ers | ||
| + | Remove the two high frequency bands | ||
| + | |||
| + | Shaul | ||
| + | |||
| + | New specs are for Imager + Spectrometer which would likely degrade the Imager at fixed cost. The Spectrometer would be a mini PIXIE, looking into cost. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The new imager has a 50 cm aperture. Specs are posted and we will focus on the specific option, which we will call the nominal 50 cm. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Time scales are short! The EC would like to know by next week so if you can run your forecasting codes by next week that would most appreciated. | ||
| + | What science are we getting from the spectrometer? | ||
| + | Action items: | ||
| + | Post the Nominal Specs | ||
| + | Get information from the spectrometer | ||