Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- oct._11_2017 [2017/10/11 09:12] – nbatta
+++ oct._11_2017 [2017/10/11 10:39] (current) – nbatta
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 CMB halo lensing (Jim and Jean-Batiste)
+https://zzz.physics.umn.edu/ipsig/_media/screen_shot_2017-10-10_at_3.46.49_pm.png
 New Imager specs (Shaul)
@@ Line 15: / Line 16: @@
 __Minutes__
+Marcelo
+Exgal simulated maps update (Marcelo).
+Peak patch method paper to come out soon , Fast but memory intensive
+/8 of sky out to z = 4.5, without repeats
+Sims on NERSC Please add link/path
+CIB is now in for 60 different band passes (with CMB probe bands please check!)
+Lensing, SZ also included
+Should we include neutrinos?
+Including variance into the gas profiles?
+Secondary Affects
+Action item:
+Please check the bands for Probe
+Maps of each component
+Jim
+CMB halo lensing forecast for 4 arcminute beam and noise 1 muK - arcmin
+EB is not sensitive to resolution, TT is, so going to smaller aperture help reduce the noise in the TT
+Almost as good as CMB-S4 EB is actually very similar.
+How did you choose the Beam size?
+-Pulled out of the air. We need an actually calculation.
+Action items:
+Colin will produce foreground cleaned noise spectra for the lens-ers
+Remove the two high frequency bands
+Shaul
+New specs are for Imager + Spectrometer which would likely degrade the Imager at fixed cost. The Spectrometer would be a mini PIXIE, looking into cost.
+The new imager has a 50 cm aperture. Specs are posted and we will focus on the specific option, which we will call the nominal 50 cm.
+Time scales are short! The EC would like to know by next week so if you can run your forecasting codes by next week that would most appreciated.
+What science are we getting from the spectrometer?
+Action items:
+Post the Nominal Specs
+Get information from the spectrometer

User Tools

Differences

Page Tools