Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
private:teleconsnotes20170628 [2017/06/28 15:32] – bcrill | private:teleconsnotes20170628 [2017/06/28 16:36] (current) – bcrill | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Telecon Notes 20170628 ====== | ====== Telecon Notes 20170628 ====== | ||
- | Attendance: Shaul,Amy, Brendan, Al \\ | + | Attendance: Shaul,Amy, Brendan, Al, Roger, Bill \\ |
Notes by: Brendan\\ | Notes by: Brendan\\ | ||
Agenda: | Agenda: | ||
* Update on management of WG and mailing lists (Shaul) | * Update on management of WG and mailing lists (Shaul) | ||
+ | * UMN physics listserv is retiring, so future working group mailing lists will be done through Google Groups: Shaul has already done this for extragalactic, | ||
* Technology Working Group and Plan (McMahon) | * Technology Working Group and Plan (McMahon) | ||
+ | * Roger put together a review of relevant technologies: | ||
+ | * Roger is technology person at JPL. Jeff and Roger plan to have offline discussion with different groups around the country - get them to augment what they have provided to S4 tech book with any material relevant to a space mission. | ||
+ | * The Inflation Probe should address some specific questions quickly: e.g., what detector technology to use above 800GHz? | ||
+ | * In the spirit of transparency, | ||
+ | * Keep in mind that this is a current snapshot showing we have a solid case fitting in the cost cap, not a formal technology selection - were this mission to fly 10-15 years from now it is likely to look very different technologically. | ||
* Update on NASA management of probes and expected deliverables (Shaul) | * Update on NASA management of probes and expected deliverables (Shaul) | ||
* {{: | * {{: | ||
+ | * Entire slide package is also available on the wiki. | ||
+ | * Study report is ~50 pages. | ||
+ | * Engineering Concept Definition Package: prepared by JPL. This is only submitted to the decadal panel on request. | ||
+ | * Can we find out what tools/ | ||
+ | * Independent Cost Estimate does not include pre-phase A technology maturation costs, but we should be careful about including too many low maturity technologies to avoid large cost penalties. | ||
* Imager WG Update (Shaul) | * Imager WG Update (Shaul) | ||
+ | * first draft baseline imager (optics/ | ||