Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| private:teleconsnotes20170726 [2017/07/26 15:36] – jbock | private:teleconsnotes20170726 [2017/07/26 16:38] (current) – jbock | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Telecon Notes 20170726 ====== | ====== Telecon Notes 20170726 ====== | ||
| - | Attendance: \\ | + | Attendance: |
| - | Notes by: \\ | + | Notes by: Jamie\\ |
| === Agenda === | === Agenda === | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| - contact Kovac about a probe talk at Harvard S4 workshop (Shaul called)\\ | - contact Kovac about a probe talk at Harvard S4 workshop (Shaul called)\\ | ||
| - communicate with John Carlstrom to share resources with S4 (reply pending)\\ | - communicate with John Carlstrom to share resources with S4 (reply pending)\\ | ||
| + | Primary work on spectrometer has been on foregrounds\\ | ||
| + | Spectrometer has shallow sensitivity up to several THz\\ | ||
| + | May offer some useful information for deep imager data over narrower range of frequencies\\ | ||
| + | What is the utility of high-frequency data given things like decorrelation? | ||
| + | The spectrometer will provide good information on dust opacity and spectral index\\ | ||
| + | It is less clear if this knowledge will prove useful at nK sensitivities\\ | ||
| + | Can the effect of decorrelation be included in Al's simulation? | ||
| + | Shaul: | ||
| + | Charles: | ||
| + | Question is does the spectrometer provide essential information for foreground removal?\\ | ||
| + | Jamie: | ||
| + | Jamie: | ||
| + | Al: Probably not, but I can quantify especially in combination with an imager.\\ | ||
| + | Can we get a picture of MIDEX/PIXIE to get some idea of physical size?\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Systematics working group has been collected, reviewing existing tools and knowledge.\\ | ||
| + | Has gotten input from Colin Bischoff on S4 work.\\ | ||
| + | Also a presentation from CORE.\\ | ||
| + | |||