Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


private:teleconsnotes20170816

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
private:teleconsnotes20170816 [2017/08/16 14:53] hananyprivate:teleconsnotes20170816 [2017/09/05 20:58] (current) hanany
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Telecon Notes 20170809 ====== ====== Telecon Notes 20170809 ======
  
-Attendance: \\ +Attendance: Jamie, Amy, Shaul, Lloyd \\ 
-Notes by: \\+Notes by: Shaul \\
  
 === Agenda === === Agenda ===
-  * Short updates: Rita'slides; Name; JPL visit; Probe + S4 Workshops +  * Short updates: {{:private:head2017_v2_sh_forrita.pptx|Rita'slide}}; Name (PICO?); JPL visit (Wed. Aug. 30); Probe + S4 Workshops 
-  * Science Traceability Matrix (Amy) + tasks to WG (Shaul, all) +  * {{:private:cmbpol_stm_template.docx|Science Traceability Matrix}} (Amy) + tasks to WG (Shaul, all) 
-  * Probe Strategy (Shaul, all)+  * {{:private:probemissionstudy_telecon_20170816.pdf|Probe Strategy}} (Shaul, all)
     * need now; a mission should fly asap regardless of r results from sub-orbital     * need now; a mission should fly asap regardless of r results from sub-orbital
     * a mission should fly if there are detections by sub-orbital     * a mission should fly if there are detections by sub-orbital
Line 13: Line 13:
 === Telecon Notes === === Telecon Notes ===
  
-__Probe Srategy__ \\+  * STM: Need input on first two columns before JPL visit. Shaul will fill in the first column from NASA strategic plan. Lloyd + other group leaders to fill other columns.  
 + 
 +  * __Probe Strategy__ \\
    
-  * Comments from Charles (by e-mail): \\+    * Jamie: what we had last decadal 'wait for detections from the ground' - what does that mean? Vague. The key issue is maintaining support for the community. Suggests a common technology program with S4. Also, we are not asked to provide a plan for the decade. We are asked to provide a Probe study.  
 +    * Lloyd: situation now vastly different than last decade. Last time we had to wait for Planck results.  
 +    * Comments from Charles (by e-mail): \\
  
 "First of all, the point of the current study is to demonstrate a CMB polarization mission that could do spectacular science for under $1 B.  The goal is a recommendation from the Decadal Review for a Probe line of missions.  One might hope that the Decadal panel would be so impressed that they made a special recommendation about a CMB polarization mission.  One might hope, but I think that hope is false.  So I wouldn't let it drive us in any way. "First of all, the point of the current study is to demonstrate a CMB polarization mission that could do spectacular science for under $1 B.  The goal is a recommendation from the Decadal Review for a Probe line of missions.  One might hope that the Decadal panel would be so impressed that they made a special recommendation about a CMB polarization mission.  One might hope, but I think that hope is false.  So I wouldn't let it drive us in any way.
private/teleconsnotes20170816.1502913225.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/08/16 14:53 by hanany