Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki
private:teleconsnotes20170913

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
private:teleconsnotes20170913 [2017/09/13 15:07] jbockprivate:teleconsnotes20170913 [2017/09/13 15:59] (current) jbock
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Telecon Notes 20170913 ====== ====== Telecon Notes 20170913 ======
  
-Attendance:  Julian, Shaul, Jens, Al, Colin, Lloyd+Attendance:  Julian, Shaul, Jens, Al, Colin, Lloyd, Amy
  
 Notes by:  Jamie Notes by:  Jamie
Line 14: Line 14:
 === Notes ==== === Notes ====
 - First presentation shows the spectrometer would fit in terms of volume - First presentation shows the spectrometer would fit in terms of volume
 +
 - would spectrometer be any smaller/simpler if it just did absolute spectrum science? - would spectrometer be any smaller/simpler if it just did absolute spectrum science?
-  - yes it would have one barrel, but would lose polarized foreground cross-comparison 
  
 +- yes it would have one barrel, but would lose polarized foreground cross-comparison
 +
 +- spectrometer working group has also been looking at smaller mirrors
 +
 +- guaranteed detection of y.  Outside of that, constraints on non slow-roll inflation.
 +
 +- can we quantify what models of inflation we would rule out?
 +
 +- unfortunately the note taker had to promptly leave at 4 PM.
  
  
private/teleconsnotes20170913.1505333264.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/13 15:07 by jbock