Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| private:teleconsnotes20170913 [2017/09/13 15:09] – jbock | private:teleconsnotes20170913 [2017/09/13 15:59] (current) – jbock | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| === Notes ==== | === Notes ==== | ||
| - | - First presentation shows the spectrometer would fit in terms of volume; | + | - First presentation shows the spectrometer would fit in terms of volume |
| - would spectrometer be any smaller/ | - would spectrometer be any smaller/ | ||
| + | |||
| - yes it would have one barrel, but would lose polarized foreground cross-comparison | - yes it would have one barrel, but would lose polarized foreground cross-comparison | ||
| + | |||
| - spectrometer working group has also been looking at smaller mirrors | - spectrometer working group has also been looking at smaller mirrors | ||
| + | - guaranteed detection of y. Outside of that, constraints on non slow-roll inflation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - can we quantify what models of inflation we would rule out? | ||
| + | - unfortunately the note taker had to promptly leave at 4 PM. | ||