Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| private:teleconsnotes20180418 [2018/04/18 15:41] – kyoung | private:teleconsnotes20180418 [2018/04/25 12:41] (current) – hanany | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| * CL: Organizing science around what drives the design. So grouping things slightly differently. Improves flow of science into mission design. | * CL: Organizing science around what drives the design. So grouping things slightly differently. Improves flow of science into mission design. | ||
| * SH: So high frequency channels (galactic science) is one of these drivers. | * SH: So high frequency channels (galactic science) is one of these drivers. | ||
| - | * CL: yes, also clear from science topics high resolution isn't a driver. | + | * CL: yes, OK. Make it clear. |
| * CL: Extragalactic science includes some things that are more cosmological than astronomical object. Those could be separate. | * CL: Extragalactic science includes some things that are more cosmological than astronomical object. Those could be separate. | ||
| * CL: Complementarity also needs to be discussed. | * CL: Complementarity also needs to be discussed. | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| * After these to rounds will release to EC. | * After these to rounds will release to EC. | ||
| * Interesting Figure from Alex Van Engelen, for APS talk. | * Interesting Figure from Alex Van Engelen, for APS talk. | ||
| - | * lensing potential, for EB estimator we seem to have lower noise. | + | * lensing potential, for EB estimator we seem to have lower noise. |
| - | * shows complementarity/ | + | * Bill: complementarity/ |
| * General discussion: Why does PICO do better? | * General discussion: Why does PICO do better? | ||
| * SH: Why S4 better at TT, PICO better at EB? | * SH: Why S4 better at TT, PICO better at EB? | ||
| * Dan: PICO beam means lose modes > ell 2000-ish. Lensing connects high ell to low, so those modes are valuable. | * Dan: PICO beam means lose modes > ell 2000-ish. Lensing connects high ell to low, so those modes are valuable. | ||
| * SH: Other new from science groups. | * SH: Other new from science groups. | ||
| - | * Nick estimates | + | * Nick estimates |
| * Nick also estimate 9 meV limit on neutrino mass. using cluster counts. dN/dz | * Nick also estimate 9 meV limit on neutrino mass. using cluster counts. dN/dz | ||
| * SH: does this make sense? | * SH: does this make sense? | ||