Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
| private:teleconsnotes20180418 [2018/04/25 12:33] – hanany | private:teleconsnotes20180418 [2018/04/25 12:41] (current) – hanany | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| * After these to rounds will release to EC. | * After these to rounds will release to EC. | ||
| * Interesting Figure from Alex Van Engelen, for APS talk. | * Interesting Figure from Alex Van Engelen, for APS talk. | ||
| - | * lensing potential, for EB estimator we seem to have lower noise. | + | * lensing potential, for EB estimator we seem to have lower noise. |
| - | * shows complementarity/ | + | * Bill: complementarity/ |
| * General discussion: Why does PICO do better? | * General discussion: Why does PICO do better? | ||
| * SH: Why S4 better at TT, PICO better at EB? | * SH: Why S4 better at TT, PICO better at EB? | ||
| * Dan: PICO beam means lose modes > ell 2000-ish. Lensing connects high ell to low, so those modes are valuable. | * Dan: PICO beam means lose modes > ell 2000-ish. Lensing connects high ell to low, so those modes are valuable. | ||
| * SH: Other new from science groups. | * SH: Other new from science groups. | ||
| - | * Nick estimates | + | * Nick estimates |
| * Nick also estimate 9 meV limit on neutrino mass. using cluster counts. dN/dz | * Nick also estimate 9 meV limit on neutrino mass. using cluster counts. dN/dz | ||
| * SH: does this make sense? | * SH: does this make sense? | ||