Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
private:teleconsnotes20180516 [2018/05/16 15:16] – kyoung | private:teleconsnotes20180516 [2018/05/16 15:26] (current) – kyoung | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
{{:: | {{:: | ||
- | * | + | * Working to make a visual we have needed. |
+ | * This made by Josquin. | ||
+ | * left vertical axis is noise levels. right vertical axis is signals (CMB, dust, synchrotron) | ||
+ | * AK: Not a fan of uK_CMB above ~300 GHz. The upper range makes synchtron, dust, etc look odd. | ||
+ | * AK: Like everything in Janskies or W/ | ||
+ | * SH: Understood. This figure works for CMB community, but maybe a second product to use in a more general context. | ||
+ | * HH: Al's point is good. Reach broader groups. | ||
+ | * AT: Yes, more general units good. | ||
+ | * SH: Al can send unit suggestion to Josquin. | ||
+ | * SH: Also planning to color code bands by pixel type. | ||
+ | * AT: Error in band location? SH: yes, iterating with Josquin. | ||
Noise Requirements vs < | Noise Requirements vs < | ||
* AT: standard NASA term is current best estimate (CBE) | * AT: standard NASA term is current best estimate (CBE) | ||
* starting from r is awkward as foreground limits aren't well understood. so r values don't set a noise requirement. | * starting from r is awkward as foreground limits aren't well understood. so r values don't set a noise requirement. | ||
- | * we'll adopt this empirical noise requirement and iterate that with science case. | + | * we'll adopt this empirical noise requirement and iterate that with science case. Then we see if this pushes us off any cliffs in terms of achievable science. |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||