Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| private:teleconsnotes20190116 [2019/01/16 14:54] – hanany | private:teleconsnotes20190116 [2019/01/16 15:35] (current) – kyoung | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Telecon Notes January 16, 2019 ====== | ====== Telecon Notes January 16, 2019 ====== | ||
| - | Attendance: | + | Attendance: |
| Notes by: Karl \\ | Notes by: Karl \\ | ||
| === Agenda === | === Agenda === | ||
| - | * [[http:// | + | * [[http:// |
| * Report {{: | * Report {{: | ||
| * outstanding item | * outstanding item | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| * We'll have to be more economic about space elsewhere | * We'll have to be more economic about space elsewhere | ||
| * How to discuss ' | * How to discuss ' | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Notes === | ||
| + | Report {{: | ||
| + | * outstanding items | ||
| + | * SH: implement comments from Amy, Charles, finish new Section 2.4 (see next), small modification in Fnl, add sentences in ES for testing LCDM (+ blue sky?), finish ES sentences regarding 'why now' | ||
| + | * RF: one sentence to clean up in ES | ||
| + | * CH: Jens and Mattieu asked about some relativistic SZ material? | ||
| + | * SH: We are now a page long (due to section 2.4) so decide after we decide on 2.4. | ||
| + | * CH: he is right that this is a niche for PICO, so a useful point. | ||
| + | * SH: No quantitative constraints? | ||
| + | * SH: ** Will have a look at it** | ||
| + | * CH: ** I will make a shorter version*** | ||
| + | * New Section 2.4, page 16: Test LCDM (includes large scale anomalies) | ||
| + | * Comments? Any other anomalies? | ||
| + | * SH: Should there be a ' | ||
| + | * CL: Don't like ' | ||
| + | * SH: We are mentioning the systematics possibility. | ||
| + | * SH: The additional point that even if CMB is self consistent there may still be tension with other data sets (real or systematic errors). | ||
| + | * CH: Is a useful thing to point out. Current text may be a bit longer than needed. | ||
| + | * SH: Highlighting where to cut would be very useful. | ||
| + | * CH: e.g. 1st paragraph sounds more like a broad, philosophical discussion. not really needed here. | ||
| + | * CL: agree. | ||
| + | * SH: This 1st paragraph could move to someplace like the ES. Can put some of this there. | ||
| + | * CL: "no detection of DM" --> "no direct detection" | ||
| + | * We'll have to be more economic about space elsewhere | ||
| + | * How to discuss ' | ||
| + | * CL: This is better. | ||
| + | * SH: Wanting to show that no new physics or new technology needs to be made for this to work. | ||
| + | * CL: I understand. But example of nothing is simple in space, 100 GHz planck. Didn't work for various reasons that don't apply here. It was a simple extension that failed. | ||
| + | * CL: people with space experience will say "if you haven' | ||
| + | * SH: could replace ' | ||
| + | * CL: sounds good. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CL: Question for Tim, have you finished a detailed edit? | ||
| + | * TP: Currently through section 2. Don't have much more time to work on this, but will do so as I can. | ||
| + | * CL: **Will start listing detailed comments** | ||
| + | |||
| + | CL: Cool cover. | ||
| + | * SH: Yes. I have received requests for this cover without PICO. Should coordinated with JPL what we share to all. | ||
| + | * CL: Deserves wide distribution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ** In principle 1 telecon in 2 weeks ** Otherwise done. Will only call telecons as needed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||