Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| private:teleconsnotes20190213 [2019/02/13 14:57] – hanany | private:teleconsnotes20190213 [2019/02/13 15:58] (current) – kyoung | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== Telecon Notes Feb. 13, 2019 ====== | ====== Telecon Notes Feb. 13, 2019 ====== | ||
| - | Attendance: | + | Attendance: |
| Notes by: Karl \\ | Notes by: Karl \\ | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * ' | * ' | ||
| * FOM figure? | * FOM figure? | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Notes === | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{: | ||
| + | * schedule: | ||
| + | * Post to astroph by ~Tues 2/26; leaves 10 days for references to be inserted into decadal science white papers. | ||
| + | * Submit to NASA shortly after. | ||
| + | * length: currently in limit. | ||
| + | * author page (current arrangement acceptable? | ||
| + | * TP: add title to page i. **KY will add back** | ||
| + | * All: no opinions. | ||
| + | * only change will be adding the title. | ||
| + | * B-detection Figure (see options above) on page 6, right side | ||
| + | * SH: polishing versions. the binning was such that at ell > 90 only had upper limits. different binning changes this. | ||
| + | * SH: should cut plot earlier (300), since no high ell information. | ||
| + | * RF: was balancing visually so minimum between reionization and recombination peaks in BB. | ||
| + | * RF: really no information at ell > 100. other versions just steal signal from ell < 100 and put it in a bin > 100. No real preference on versions though. | ||
| + | * SH: didn't understand the lack of signal > 100. (see V4, no limits above 100 in 1 big bin.) | ||
| + | * AT: like V1 the best. could de-emphasize higher ell's and keep visual look by moving line labels to left and cutting at ell ~ 200. | ||
| + | * SH: concern is that there was no clear reason for del(ell) = 10 when ell > 100. Confused me when reading, not sure what to present so readers aren't confused. | ||
| + | * RF: original delta ell was chosen to ensure no complaints of playing with signal by changing binning. | ||
| + | * CL: like V3, visually. The binning choice doesn' | ||
| + | * SH: Leave binning as is for now, but cut at 300. RF: ok, can do that. | ||
| + | * CL: slight preference for many bins so there is a slight curve at end. visually nice. | ||
| + | * Spectrometer words? | ||
| + | * SH: currently no mention in report. People ask after/ | ||
| + | * CL: Agree, don't mention spectrometer. | ||
| + | * AT: This isn't proposal, is an example. So spectrometer shout out is ok. But no strong need. Also don't know where it would make sense. | ||
| + | * CL: discussing what we didn't decide to study is odd. | ||
| + | * AT: We have talked about trade-offs in terms of FDM/TDM, detectors, etc. But different mission is very different. | ||
| + | * AT: The only pro is to shout out spectrometer people. | ||
| + | * SH: will remain as is. | ||
| + | * Couple remaining items | ||
| + | * ' | ||
| + | * FOM figure? | ||
| + | * SH: All this done this week, so 1 week before submission. | ||
| + | |||
| + | SH: Paul Hertz town hall had specific words about probe presentation to decadal. | ||
| + | |||
| + | AT: SPHEREx accepted for Phase B. Congrats to Jamie et al. | ||
| + | * SH: who else? | ||
| + | * CL: midEx is SPHEREx. | ||
| + | |||
| + | CL: Reiterate that this cover is very good. Have gotten many requests for this figure for people to use in talks. | ||
| + | * we make a poster of this image. | ||
| + | * make this image available as is. | ||
| + | * make image available without lettering and without spacecraft. | ||
| + | * Opinions? | ||
| + | * All: no objections. Some verbal ' | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||