Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


private:teleconsnotes20191127

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
private:teleconsnotes20191127 [2019/11/27 13:20] hananyprivate:teleconsnotes20191127 [2019/12/03 14:23] (current) hanany
Line 15: Line 15:
       * Kahn (Chair), Barsotti, Barto, Bay, Elvis, Hailey, Kouveliotou, **Lawrence**, **Moseley**, Mukherjee, **Page**, Stacey       * Kahn (Chair), Barsotti, Barto, Bay, Elvis, Hailey, Kouveliotou, **Lawrence**, **Moseley**, Mukherjee, **Page**, Stacey
     * RFI and TRACE     * RFI and TRACE
-  * Response to RFI+    * Possible outcomes ({{:private:hertz_nasa_update_caa_nov_2019_v3a_onlydecadal_s.pdf|Hertz slides from CAA meeting yesterday}}) 
 +  * Response to {{:private:rfi-ii_space.docx|RFI}} and {{:private:rfi-ii_space_sh_comments.docx|RFI with SH embedded comments}} 
 +    * What are the key challenges?  
 +    * What are the overarching message(s)?  
 +    * Response Format: response to questions, flowing report, combination? Heavy referencing of existing documents or rewrite material?  
 +    * Executive Summary - needs revision 
 +    * Science  
 +  * Conflict with B-mode workshop at Munich: who is attending? anyone else can give the talk?  
 + 
 +==== Notes ==== 
 + 
 +  * Shaul reviews state of PICO since submission of report including PCAT report 
 +  * Discussion of RFI:  
 +    * Shaul thinks the single key perceived challenge for readiness could be foregrounds. Not clear what can be done about this more than is already presented in the report.  
 +    * Response format: respond to specific questions, not 'another narrative report'.  
 +    * Some discussion of response to specific RFI elements, only in Science
private/teleconsnotes20191127.1574882446.txt.gz · Last modified: 2019/11/27 13:20 by hanany