Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


sept._27_2017

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
sept._27_2017 [2017/09/27 09:16] nbattasept._27_2017 [2017/09/27 09:46] (current) nbatta
Line 1: Line 1:
-Sept. 27 2017 +__Sept. 27 2017__ 
  
 Attendees: Alex, Jean-Baptiste, Mat M, Max, Jim, Jacques, Colin Attendees: Alex, Jean-Baptiste, Mat M, Max, Jim, Jacques, Colin
Line 7: Line 7:
 ** Component separation (Colin and Max)** ** Component separation (Colin and Max)**
  
 +Pipeline is very transferable to Probe simulations, applicable to straight S/N estimates, tSZ, kSZ, lensing, etc.
  
 ** Update on the CORE sims with CMB probe bands (Jacques)** ** Update on the CORE sims with CMB probe bands (Jacques)**
  
-Mathieu Remazeilles ran new simulations with an updated Planck Sky Model +  * Mathieu Remazeilles ran new simulations with an updated Planck Sky Model 
-Temperature only, ell_max = 6000, Nside = 4096. 20 redshift bins. +  Temperature only, ell_max = 6000, Nside = 4096. 20 redshift bins. Clusters at M > 5e13 
-They contain, SZ, rSZ, Radio, IR contamination (independent of CIB density field), CIB, CMB, galactic foregrounds. +  They contain, SZ, rSZ, Radio, IR contamination (independent of CIB density field), CIB, CMB, galactic foregrounds. 
-Now observing with CMB probe bands+  Now observing with CMB probe bands
  
-Still need to validate SZ-CIB correlation, the lensing-CIB has been validated.+Still needs to be validate SZ-CIB correlation, the lensing-CIB has been validated.
  
-Where will these simulations be placed?+__Where will these simulations be placed?__ 
 + 
 +They will be posted on a site hosted by Manchester (Mathieu or Jacques please post link), please copy whole directory.
  
 **Angular resolution discussion (Nick)** **Angular resolution discussion (Nick)**
  
-Tabling Argonne Sim discussion+Simulations will be paramount here. The need for higher res is obvious for extragalactic point source and CIB science. For clusters and galaxy formation questions, high res will help with dust contamination, but we need to check this. 
 + 
 +Tabling Argonne Sim discussion for the next call 
 + 
 +Other Business
  
-Other+Wu & Dore paper on reconstructing star-formation history, should we consider this? 
 +http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4150W
  
sept._27_2017.1506521765.txt.gz · Last modified: 2017/09/27 09:16 by nbatta