Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- sept._27_2017 [2017/09/27 09:18] – nbatta
+++ sept._27_2017 [2017/09/27 09:46] (current) – nbatta
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-Sept. 27 2017
+__Sept. 27 2017__
 Attendees: Alex, Jean-Baptiste, Mat M, Max, Jim, Jacques, Colin
@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 ** Component separation (Colin and Max)**
+Pipeline is very transferable to Probe simulations, applicable to straight S/N estimates, tSZ, kSZ, lensing, etc.
 ** Update on the CORE sims with CMB probe bands (Jacques)**
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Still needs to be validate SZ-CIB correlation, the lensing-CIB has been validated.
-Where will these simulations be placed?
+__Where will these simulations be placed?__
+They will be posted on a site hosted by Manchester (Mathieu or Jacques please post link), please copy whole directory.
 **Angular resolution discussion (Nick)**
-Tabling Argonne Sim discussion
+Simulations will be paramount here. The need for higher res is obvious for extragalactic point source and CIB science. For clusters and galaxy formation questions, high res will help with dust contamination, but we need to check this.
+Tabling Argonne Sim discussion for the next call
+Other Business
-Other
+Wu & Dore paper on reconstructing star-formation history, should we consider this?
+http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.4150W