Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
systematicswg:telecons:2018-01-17:start [2018/01/17 10:56] – bcrill | systematicswg:telecons:2018-01-17:start [2018/01/17 12:05] (current) – bcrill | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
**Notes for Jan 17 2018 Telecon** | **Notes for Jan 17 2018 Telecon** | ||
- | On the call: Brendan, Maurizio, | + | On the call: Brendan, Maurizio, |
- | + | | |
- | | + | |
** a good deadline for finishing the bulk of our work | ** a good deadline for finishing the bulk of our work | ||
+ | ** proposing an hour or so presentation on systematics, | ||
* updates on The Big Three | * updates on The Big Three | ||
- | ** Gain stability | + | |
- | ** Far Sidelobes | + | ** Plan for toast runs: PICO focal plane layout not trivial(because not hex-packed), |
- | ** Absolute Polarization Angle calibration | + | |
+ | ** Far Sidelobes: GRASP sims available (see Imager page). | ||
+ | ** Absolute Polarization Angle calibration. Can use analytic solution to look at what happens when we don't solve for absolute polarization angle (by say, minimizing EB and TB). | ||
* Cubesat calibration concept | * Cubesat calibration concept | ||
+ | ** original idea proposed for Litebird | ||
+ | ** some resources coming in a few months for some preliminary engineering work to be done. This is likely to provide some results on a time scale that is useful to PICO. | ||
+ | ** will try to generalize for Litebird and PICO in the near term. | ||
+ | ** proposing to ESA (6 March deadline), building up a consortium for a larger 3 year cubesat project. | ||
+ | ** The idea: a piggyback satellite that autonomously deploys and positions itself. | ||
+ | ** goal is a few kg mass, and cost ~ 1% of total cost of mission. | ||
+ | ** The idea is to " | ||
+ | * Cover wide frequency band: 10's of GHz, 40-400 GHz originally conceived. | ||
+ | * Monochromatic tones that can be swept in frequency. | ||
+ | * Future ESA work will study some key trades, cost, mass, etc., and even possibly look at hardware demos. | ||
+ | * Do Galactic science need better than 1 degree precision in polarization angle? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||