Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Probe Mission Study Wiki

User Tools


systematicswg:telecons:2018-01-17:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
systematicswg:telecons:2018-01-17:start [2018/01/17 11:44] bcrillsystematicswg:telecons:2018-01-17:start [2018/01/17 12:05] (current) bcrill
Line 15: Line 15:
     ** original idea proposed for Litebird     ** original idea proposed for Litebird
     ** some resources coming in a few months for some preliminary engineering work to be done.  This is likely to provide some results on a time scale that is useful to PICO.     ** some resources coming in a few months for some preliminary engineering work to be done.  This is likely to provide some results on a time scale that is useful to PICO.
-    ** will try to generalize for Litebird and PICO, and for a large+    ** will try to generalize for Litebird and PICO in the near term.
     ** proposing to ESA (6 March deadline), building up a consortium for a larger 3 year cubesat project.  Will study the performance gains for a larger mission (e.g. CORE)     ** proposing to ESA (6 March deadline), building up a consortium for a larger 3 year cubesat project.  Will study the performance gains for a larger mission (e.g. CORE)
     ** The idea: a piggyback satellite that autonomously deploys and positions itself.  Attitude and orbital control are the key issues.     ** The idea: a piggyback satellite that autonomously deploys and positions itself.  Attitude and orbital control are the key issues.
 +    ** goal is a few kg mass, and cost ~ 1% of total cost of mission.
     ** The idea is to "Calibrate Everything" Polarization angle, photometry, main beams, far sidelobes.       ** The idea is to "Calibrate Everything" Polarization angle, photometry, main beams, far sidelobes.  
        * Cover wide frequency band: 10's of GHz, 40-400 GHz originally conceived.          * Cover wide frequency band: 10's of GHz, 40-400 GHz originally conceived.  
-       * Monochromatic tones that move in frequency.+       * Monochromatic tones that can be swept in frequency. 
 +     * Future ESA work will study some key trades, cost, mass, etc., and even possibly look at hardware demos. 
 +   * Do Galactic science need better than 1 degree precision in polarization angle?
  
  
  
  
systematicswg/telecons/2018-01-17/start.1516211084.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/01/17 11:44 by bcrill