Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-04:start [2018/04/04 11:19] – bcrill
+++ systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-04:start [2018/04/04 13:38] (current) – kyoung
@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
       * Toast Bug: sudden jumps in pointing timeline
       * While Andrea et al try to solve toast bugs, Maurizio is adapting a different sim code just to get an estimate of the dipole calibration.  Might be enough.
-      * bug in the toast bug report system, Andrea and Ted K are aware of the bug, but no progress in ~ 1month
+      * bug in the toast bug report system, Andrea and Ted K are aware of the bug, but no progress in ~ 1month [[https://github.com/hpc4cmb/toast/issues/224|See here for github discussion.]]
+      * Andrea Z and Maurizio to meet in person next week: this is on the agenda for their meeting.
+      * Another workaround: perhaps if this bug was introduced by a recent commit, then just revert toast version to non-buggy version.. maybe going back to the CORE version.
+      * Maurizio to also check against CORE pointing.
+      * Or possibly even just some brute force scripting to correct the problem.
+  * Karl: GRASP
+      * Plots prepped for TeamX, {{::grasp_results_20180318_karl.pdf| GRASP slides (Karl)}}
+      * Basically ready with a 4pi sidelobe beam: Karl to produce a visualization
+        * See plots below.  The first 2, with 2 circles per plot, are projected such that the forward 2*pi of the beam is shown in the left-hand plot, theta = 0 at the center, and the right hand plot shows the backward 2*pi, theta = 180 at the center.  The second 2 plots are the same simulation in a different projection.  Note on coordinates: co-pol is the E-field in the xz plane, cross-pol is the E-field in the yz plane.  Plots labeled pol X are using a beam from a feedhorn linearly polarized in the xz plane. Those labeled pol Y are from a feedhorn linearly polarized in the yz plane.
+        *  {{:systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-04:polx_corrected_4pi.png?direct&100|Pol X}}  {{:systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-04:poly_corrected_4pi.png?direct&100|Pol Y}}  {{:systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-04:polx_corrected_4pi_flat_projection.png?direct&100|Pol X}}  {{:systematicswg:telecons:2018-04-04:poly_corrected_4pi_flat_projection.png?direct&100|Pol Y}}
+      * Brendan to ping Julian and Jacques about various code availability / sim plans for calculating pickup
+  * Eric: beam angle
+      * What is the noise at low ell?  he can assume white noise based on the instrumental sensitivity
+      * Table of sims specify knee frequency in time domain, but sims need to be run
+      * Angle errors: assumptions can be made that around 0.2 degrees
+      * What can you do if you don't try to null EB correlations?  How big a problem is it.
+      * Check [[https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.3532|Yadav et al]]: they argue that S/N of EB correlation from a systematic will always be much larger than S/N on contamination in BB.
       *

User Tools

Differences

Page Tools