Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools


aaac:apr27

This is an old revision of the document!


AAAC Proposal Pressures Group: Agenda April 27, 2015

List of possible survey questions that go beyond the Von Hippel Survey

Important note: This list is far too long and we would clearly need to reduce the number of questions, The ones listed are just examples
  • How would the following actions by the funding agencies affect you?
    • Limiting applicants to one PI or CoI proposal per year:
      • This action would increase the time I could spend on my research
      • This action would reduce my chances for tenure.
      • This action would cause me to leave the field.
      • This action would reduce the number of proposals I submit.
      • This action would improve the quality of those proposals I submit
      • This action would reduce the size of my research group
    • Calling for proposals every other year
      • Etc..
    • Introducing a pre-proposal stage.
      • Etc…
    • Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals
      • Etc..
    • Creating smaller research grants for exploratory research, with an expectation that successful proposals are likely to be funded in the following year
  • Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or “are available to me” )
  • There are too many scientists in the field of astrophysics and the success rate is an appropriate method of population control

All these are to answered by strongly agree ←→ neutral ←→ strongly disagree)

aaac/apr27.1429897104.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/04/24 12:38 by prisca