Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools

Trace: • dec19 • apr27
aaac:apr27

This is an old revision of the document!

AAAC Proposal Pressures Group: Agenda April 27, 2015

  • Presentation by Ted Von Hipple on the article and its survey. Linked at RESOURCES
  • Discussion: See below for a list of possible survey questions
  • Moving forward with Agency Statistics and Analysis.
  • Here is the Longer report on Proposal Pressures that was not in finished form by the March 2015 AAAC report. It may be a good place to start - what are the questions not yet answered, what additional information is required to make a case.
  • Next Teleconference - AOB

Sample questions that go beyond the Von Hippel Survey

Important note: This list is far too long and we would clearly need to reduce the number of questions, The ones listed are just examples

Answer these questions with a scale: strongly agree <--> neutral <--> strongly disagree)

  • How would the following actions by the funding agencies affect you?
    • Limiting applicants to one PI or CoI proposal per year:
      • This action would increase the time I could spend on my research
      • This action would reduce my chances for tenure.
      • This action would cause me to leave the field.
      • This action would reduce the number of proposals I submit.
      • This action would improve the quality of those proposals I submit
      • This action would reduce the size of my research group
    • Calling for proposals every other year
      • Etc..
    • Introducing a pre-proposal stage.
      • Etc…
    • Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals
      • Etc..
    • Creating smaller research grants for exploratory research, with an expectation that successful proposals are likely to be funded in the following year
  • Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or “are available to me” )
  • There are too many scientists in the field of astrophysics and the low success rate is an appropriate method of population control
  • My institution uses successful proposals as a primary reason for promotion

Other questions

  • If my proposal is rejected, (choose one answer that best represents your action)
    • I resubmit the same proposal the next year
    • I submit a different type of proposal the next year
    • I support my research on someone else's grant
    • I submit a similar proposal to a different federal funding source
    • I submit a similar proposal to a private funding source
    • I concentrate on other aspects of my job (e.g. teaching)
aaac/apr27.1430160844.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/04/27 13:54 by prisca

Page Tools