• Presentation by Ted Von Hipple on the article and its survey. Linked at RESOURCES
• Discussion: See below for a list of possible survey questions
• Moving forward with Agency Statistics and Analysis.
  

Here is the Longer report on Proposal Pressures that was not in finished form by the March 2015 AAAC report. It may be a good place to start - what are the questions not yet answered, what additional information is required to make a case.

• Next Teleconference - AOB

• How would the following actions by the funding agencies affect you?
  • Limiting applicants to one PI or CoI proposal per year:
    • would increase the time I could spend on my research
    • would reduce my chances for tenure.
    • would cause me to leave the field.
    • would reduce the number of proposals I submit.
    • would improve the quality of those proposals I submit
    • would reduce the size of my research group
  • Calling for proposals every other year
    • Etc..
  • Introducing a pre-proposal stage.
    • Etc…
  • Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals
    • Etc..
  • Creating smaller research grants for exploratory research, with an expectation that successful proposals are likely to be funded in the following year

• Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or “are available to me” )
• There are too many scientists in the field of astrophysics and the low success rate is an appropriate method of population control
• My institution uses successful proposals as a primary reason for promotion

• If my proposal is rejected, (choose one answer that best represents your action)
  • I resubmit the same proposal the next year
  • I submit a different type of proposal the next year
  • I support my research on someone else's grant
  • I submit a similar proposal to a different federal funding source
  • I submit a similar proposal to a private funding source
  • I concentrate on other aspects of my job (e.g. teaching)