Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools


aaac:may26

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
aaac:may26 [2015/05/26 13:41] priscaaaac:may26 [2015/05/26 14:09] (current) prisca
Line 14: Line 14:
  
  
-===== Additional Information and references ===== 
-==== Sample questions that go beyond the Von Hippel Survey  (Item 2) ==== 
-//Important note:  This list is far too long and we would clearly need to reduce the number of questions,  The ones listed are just examples // 
- 
-== Answer these questions with a scale:  strongly agree <--> neutral <--> strongly disagree) == 
-  * How would the following actions by the funding agencies affect you? 
-    * Limiting applicants to one PI or CoI proposal per year: 
-      * would increase the time I could spend on my research 
-      * would reduce my chances for tenure. 
-      * would cause me to leave the field. 
-      * would reduce the number of proposals I submit.  
-      * would improve the quality of those proposals I submit 
-      * would reduce the size of my research group 
-    * Calling for proposals every other year 
-      * Etc.. 
-    * Introducing a pre-proposal stage. 
-      * Etc... 
-    * Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals 
-      * Etc.. 
-    * Creating smaller research grants for exploratory research, with an expectation that successful proposals are likely to be funded in the following year 
- 
-  * Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or "are available to me" ) 
-  * There are too many scientists in the field of astrophysics and the low success rate is an appropriate method of population control 
- 
-== Other questions == 
- 
-  * If my proposal is rejected, (choose one answer that best represents your action) 
-    * I resubmit the same proposal the next year 
-    * I submit a different type of proposal the next year 
-    * I support my research on someone else's grant 
-    * I submit a similar proposal to a different federal funding source 
-    * I submit a similar proposal to a private funding source 
-    * I concentrate on other aspects of my job (e.g. teaching)  
- 
-==== Sharpen arguments from the Agency statistics. (Item 3) ==== 
-//The {{:aaac:aaacdemosection_long.docx|Longer report on Proposal Pressures}} that was not in finished form by the March 2015 AAAC report, may be a good place to start.  What are the questions not yet answered, what additional information is required to make a case.// 
- 
-== Further analysis of the proposal per year and proposal per 3 year NSF data == 
-== A few more snapshots of the NASA Astrophysics merit criteria. == 
-== Explore further effect of pre-proposal strategy on those that have tried it == 
-== Detailed comparison of DOE Cosmic Frontier model vs NSF, NASA wrt results.  Any lessons to be learned? == 
-== Better data on cost per proposal and number of PI's on proposals, etc == 
-  
aaac/may26.1432665708.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/05/26 13:41 by prisca