This is an old revision of the document!
Agenda May 26, 2015
Work Plan
Use the data already collected and mine it for some more specific questions and data-driven scenarios
Determine what information didn't make it into the original survey and incorporate it in the new one.
Gather a larger data set and cover more agencies for the conditional and correlated information.
Sample questions that go beyond the Von Hippel Survey
= Important note: This list is far too long and we would clearly need to reduce the number of questions, The ones listed are just examples =
Answer these questions with a scale: strongly agree <--> neutral <--> strongly disagree)
Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or “are available to me” )
There are too many scientists in the field of astrophysics and the low success rate is an appropriate method of population control
Other questions
Sharpen arguments from the Agency statistics.
= The Longer report on Proposal Pressures that was not in finished form by the March 2015 AAAC report, may be a good place to start. What are the questions not yet answered, what additional information is required to make a case.=
Further analysis of the proposal per year and proposal per 3 year NSF data
A few more snapshots of the NASA Astrophysics merit criteria.
Explore further effect of pre-proposal strategy on those that have tried it
Detailed comparison of DOE Cosmic Frontier model vs NSF, NASA wrt results. diAny lessons to be learned?
Better data on cost per proposal and number of PI's on proposals, etc