Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials

User Tools


aaac:newsurvey

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
aaac:newsurvey [2015/05/26 14:08] priscaaaac:newsurvey [2015/10/23 13:49] (current) – [3. Demographics] todd_hoeksema
Line 1: Line 1:
-==== Sample questions that go beyond the Von Hippel Survey   ==== +===== Sample questions that go beyond the Von Hippel Survey   ===== 
-//Important note:  This list is far too long and we would clearly need to reduce the number of questions,  The ones listed are just examples //+ 
 +==== 1. (Prisca) Questions which try to access community response to possible "solutions"====
  
 == Answer these questions with a scale:  strongly agree <--> neutral <--> strongly disagree) == == Answer these questions with a scale:  strongly agree <--> neutral <--> strongly disagree) ==
Line 13: Line 14:
     * Calling for proposals every other year     * Calling for proposals every other year
       * Etc..       * Etc..
-    * Introducing a pre-proposal stage.+    * Introducing a pre-proposal stage 
 +      * Etc... 
 +    * Introducing an exploratory stage with minimal funding.
       * Etc...       * Etc...
     * Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals     * Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals
       * Etc..       * Etc..
-    * Creating smaller research grants for exploratory research, with an expectation that successful proposals are likely to be funded in the following year +    * Eliminating one-
- +
-  * Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or "are available to me" ) +
-  * There are too many scientists in the field of astrophysics and the low success rate is an appropriate method of population control +
- +
-== Other questions ==+
  
 +  
 +==== 2. Personal Choices, tracking futures ====
   * If my proposal is rejected, (choose one answer that best represents your action)   * If my proposal is rejected, (choose one answer that best represents your action)
     * I resubmit the same proposal the next year     * I resubmit the same proposal the next year
Line 31: Line 31:
     * I submit a similar proposal to a private funding source     * I submit a similar proposal to a private funding source
     * I concentrate on other aspects of my job (e.g. teaching)      * I concentrate on other aspects of my job (e.g. teaching) 
 +  * If I am unsuccessful at obtaining federal funding for 5 years, I am most likely to
 +    * Switch research fields
 +    * Switch jobs into something that does not require resea
 +    * Concentrate on non-federal funding sources
 +    * Move to another country in order to pursue the same research field
  
 +==== 3. Demographics ====
  
 +  - Which professional organization do you consider your primarily scientific affiliation: AAS, SPD, DPS, other
 +  - At what type of institution do you work? Res.U., 2 or 4-yr College, FFRDC, Commercial, other
 +  - How many years has it been since you received your terminal degree?
 +  - What fraction of your own salary comes from 
 +    - your home institution?
 +    - federally funded competed research grants/contracts (CRG/Cs)?
 +    - other projects funded by U.S. govt. agencies (e.g. a NASA mission)?
 +    - other sources?
 +    - CRG/Cs on which you are the PI?
 +    - CRG/Cs on which you are not the PI?
 +  - How many CRG/Cs support your own work (at >5% per year)?
 +  - Have you submitted a PI proposal in the last 5 years?
 +  - If so:
 +    - For how many competed research grants/contracts (CRG/Cs)are you the PI?
 +    - How many science FTE's are supported by CRG/Cs on which you are the PI?
 +    - How many CRG/Cs does it take to support one FTE of science effort?
 +    - What has been your personal experience over the last 5 years in terms of proposal success rate?
 +    - Over the last 5/10 years, how many initially unsuccessful proposals have you resubmitted in subsequent competitions?  
 +  - Has your research group gained or lost people over the last 5 years?
 +  - In the last 5 years have you, because of funding, changed your professional activities (left the field, retired, worked reduced hours, etc.)  
 +  - Have you or anyone in your research group left the field?
 +    - Were you/they early, mid, or late career?
 +    - Where did you/they go?
 +  - Have you or anyone in your research group joined the field?
 +    - Were you/they early, mid, or late career?
 +    - Where did you/they come from?
 +  - How many scientists do you consider to be part of your research group?
 +  - Does the current CRG/C success rate affect your ability to attract students? Postdocs? Others?
 +  - What do you think is the cause of reduced CRG/C success rates?
 +  - What is the biggest impact of CRG/C success rate declines over the last several years?
 +  - What do you think should be done to address the CRC/C success-rate issue?
 +==== PLEASE ADD YOUR SECTIONS HERE ====
aaac/newsurvey.1432667294.txt.gz · Last modified: 2015/05/26 14:08 by prisca