Important note: This list is far too long and we would clearly need to reduce the number of questions, The ones listed are just examples

• How would the following actions by the funding agencies affect you?
  • Limiting applicants to one PI or CoI proposal per year:
    • would increase the time I could spend on my research
    • would reduce my chances for tenure.
    • would cause me to leave the field.
    • would reduce the number of proposals I submit.
    • would improve the quality of those proposals I submit
    • would reduce the size of my research group
  • Calling for proposals every other year
    • Etc..
  • Introducing a pre-proposal stage.
    • Etc…
  • Reducing the amount of funding for individual proposals
    • Etc..
  • Creating smaller research grants for exploratory research, with an expectation that successful proposals are likely to be funded in the following year

• Proposals to non-governmental research funds are easier to get funded (or “are available to me” )
• Lengthening the proposal cycles (at two years minimum) would be desirable. With that I do not mean submit every other year only, but also allowing the DURATION of each proposal (and the relevant funding) to be for two years instead of one. In short, make two year proposals mandatory.

• If my proposal is rejected, (choose one answer that best represents your action)
  • I resubmit the same proposal the next year
  • I submit a different type of proposal the next year
  • I support my research on someone else's grant
  • I submit a similar proposal to a different federal funding source
  • I submit a similar proposal to a private funding source
  • I concentrate on other aspects of my job (e.g. teaching)