Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
dm_task_force:feb7-13 [2013/02/06 10:08] – prisca | dm_task_force:feb7-13 [2013/02/21 14:57] (current) – chao.zhang | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | == February 7, 2013 AGENDA == | + | ==== February 7, 2013 AGENDA |
* White Paper Discussion [[: | * White Paper Discussion [[: | ||
* Discussion of Section III-C-5. | * Discussion of Section III-C-5. | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Melinda' | * Melinda' | ||
* how do we fold in FLUKA? | * how do we fold in FLUKA? | ||
- | * Any updates on the LXe comparison? | + | * Any updates on the LXe comparison? |
- | * Status of the LAr Sim (Chao) | + | * Status of the LAr Sim (Chao){{: |
- | | + | === Drafts of the Ge and LXe analysis cuts === |
- | * LXe | + | |
- | * Ge | + | Events that are potential signals pass the following cuts: Energy ROI is 5-25 keVnr,veto on electron recoil energy < 50 keVee deposited in liquid Xe, fiducial cut: r < 93cm & |z| < 84 cm, multiples cut - σr < 3cm & σz < 0.2cm |
- | * LAr | + | * Ge |
+ | Energy ROI is 5-100 keV, veto on muon entering water shield, Yield cut = no ER of more than 10%, single detectors of 10cm diam and 1 inch thickness | ||
+ | * LAr | ||
+ | Energy ROI is 15-100 keV, veto on electron recoil energy above ?? deposited in the water shield, | ||