Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| dpf:april [2018/04/30 19:46] – [Discussion] prisca | dpf:april [2020/04/23 13:03] (current) – [Play to the APS April meeting complementary strengths] matthew.szydagis | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| * (Sheldon) Have contacts in the relevant experiments generate interest by scheduling many >20 min invited talks. Try and make these talks general covering several experiments. | * (Sheldon) Have contacts in the relevant experiments generate interest by scheduling many >20 min invited talks. Try and make these talks general covering several experiments. | ||
| * (Sheldon) Registration cost is too high (is this connected to the venue?) | * (Sheldon) Registration cost is too high (is this connected to the venue?) | ||
| + | * (Matthew) perhaps also anathema! Discourage collaborations from sending 15 students to give separate talks on teeny-tiny aspects of large experiment (my own did this: LZ/LUX) and instead encourage 1 talk by senior graduate student or postdoc or even faculty (invited?)? This would address massively parallel problem, because perhaps would end sessions that are the same people talking to each other. | ||
| * Can we promote better and more poster sessions? Food! Possibly special registration rates? Incentives? | * Can we promote better and more poster sessions? Food! Possibly special registration rates? Incentives? | ||
| * Reject abstracts (is this anathema?) - have a quota and the rest go to posters. | * Reject abstracts (is this anathema?) - have a quota and the rest go to posters. | ||
| * Encourage specific fields that have NOT been sending representatives | * Encourage specific fields that have NOT been sending representatives | ||
| * Please write down which fields are under-represented at the April meeting here. | * Please write down which fields are under-represented at the April meeting here. | ||
| - | |||
| ==== Encourage undergraduate attendance ==== | ==== Encourage undergraduate attendance ==== | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| * Provide a forum for undergraduate talks. | * Provide a forum for undergraduate talks. | ||
| * SPS provides funding for travel. | * SPS provides funding for travel. | ||
| + | * If we really want undergraduate attendance we shouldn' | ||
| ==== Mentoring and career building advice for graduate students and young researchers ==== | ==== Mentoring and career building advice for graduate students and young researchers ==== | ||
| Line 37: | Line 38: | ||
| * Feature talks across divisions. | * Feature talks across divisions. | ||
| * (Prisca) Can we do this really early? | * (Prisca) Can we do this really early? | ||
| + | * (Matthew) lots of confusion currently, where for example my collaborators on LUX/LZ send some abstracts to DPF, others to DAP or DNP even. | ||
| * Publicize and encourage attendance at the " | * Publicize and encourage attendance at the " | ||
| * Can we come up with practical strategies for that? | * Can we come up with practical strategies for that? | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
| * (Prisca) Coordinate this with SNOWMASS planning (at business meeting ? | * (Prisca) Coordinate this with SNOWMASS planning (at business meeting ? | ||
| * Mental Health issues and Work-Family balance | * Mental Health issues and Work-Family balance | ||
| - | * Forming healthy and efficient large collaborations | + | * Forming healthy and efficient large collaborations |
| * Connections to the on-going Congressional Visits by FNAL and SLAC and others. Possibly tutorials in approaching senators - might already exist in general - we could have a HEP specific session after the more general APS one. | * Connections to the on-going Congressional Visits by FNAL and SLAC and others. Possibly tutorials in approaching senators - might already exist in general - we could have a HEP specific session after the more general APS one. | ||