A Task Force was established in 2013 to examine just this issue. Please read their report before proceeding further! Report of the APS Task Force to Re‐envision the April Meeting

Dmitri, Prisca, and Bob met with Patti McBride who served on the Task Force in order to understand the background to the findings and what the APS reaction was to the Task Force recommendations. A summary of our discussion can be found here: Summary of our discussion with Patti

• (name) go ahead and put comments here…
• (Jodi) I don't think moving the meeting to Washington is a good idea. It would be cost prohibitive, unless done in January and then congress and their staffers are on break which would defeat the purpose of organizing or engaging in lobbing and/or congressional visits.

• (Sheldon) Keep date fixed and also the location
• (Sheldon) too many other conferences in spring e.g. Moriond, etc.

• (Prisca) This has been suggested, but I think it will be both confusing as well as continuing the downward spiral of attendance. We should be encouraging attendance every year and emphasizing complementary aspects.

• The massively parallel agenda discourages some of what we are trying to do.
  • (Sheldon) Have contacts in the relevant experiments generate interest by scheduling many >20 min invited talks. Try and make these talks general covering several experiments.
  • (Sheldon) Registration cost is too high (is this connected to the venue?)
• Can we promote better and more poster sessions? Food! Possibly special registration rates? Incentives?
• Reject abstracts (is this anathema?) - have a quota and the rest go to posters.
• Encourage specific fields that have NOT been sending representatives
  • Please write down which fields are under-represented at the April meeting here.

• Designate a DPF program committee member to be in charge of this
• Provide a forum for undergraduate talks. Find a forum organizer from one of the teaching universities.
• SPS provides funding for travel. Provide better linkage to SPS via DPF website or other.

• Need point person to look into this for Denver
• There are existing forums and panels - connect DPF to APS, don't reinvent the wheel.
• Are there DPF-specific programs we could do? I envision a cocktail party for networking in HEP

• Feature talks across divisions. More combined sessions.
  • (Prisca) Can we do this really early? Maybe Young Kee and I need to talk to DAP and DNP about combining sorting categories from the start? Or maybe we all just get our abstracts and then consider combining sessions by combining abstracts right from the beginning?
• Publicize and encourage attendance at the “other” sessions (outreach, climate, public policy, history)
  • Can we come up with practical strategies for that?
  • Coordinate with the other forums or provide our own twist.
• Use the APS Media that already exists to publicize our sessions.

• (Sheldon) Have a regular NSF/DOE update and present status
• (Prisca) Coordinate this with SNOWMASS planning (at business meeting ?
• Mental Health issues and Work-Family balance (mostly directed to young researchers)
• Forming healthy and efficient large collaborations
• Connections to the on-going Congressional Visits by FNAL and SLAC and others. Possibly tutorials in approaching senators - might already exist in general - we could have a HEP specific session after the more general APS one.

• Pick a member of the Program Committee to be in charge of outreach - they can work with newest DPF outreach coordinator
• Start Denver 2019 work right away
• Involve local institutions (e.g. Science Museum, Universities, technical colleges, High Schools, QuarkNet.
• Learn from the Plasma Physics people http://www.apsdpp.org/outreach.php
• Link to the overall theme of the meeting. e.g. Screening Interstellar this April with Kip Thorne - since the theme is LIGO and the Nobel Prize.