Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
dpf:snowmass:minnesota [2019/12/04 14:57] – prisca | dpf:snowmass:minnesota [2019/12/18 19:07] (current) – bobbernstein | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==== Fermilab and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, | ==== Fermilab and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, | ||
+ | * {{: | ||
* {{: | * {{: | ||
* Organizing Committee. FNAL: Bob Bernstein (co-Chair), Pushpa Bhat, Patrick Fox, Andrew Norman, Peter Shanahan, Joseph Zennamo. | * Organizing Committee. FNAL: Bob Bernstein (co-Chair), Pushpa Bhat, Patrick Fox, Andrew Norman, Peter Shanahan, Joseph Zennamo. | ||
Line 8: | Line 9: | ||
* Banquet and reception cost per person, assuming 500 people. How would that number change if we went up or down by 250 people? | * Banquet and reception cost per person, assuming 500 people. How would that number change if we went up or down by 250 people? | ||
* reception and poster session included in the registration fee ($495 before subsidy). | * reception and poster session included in the registration fee ($495 before subsidy). | ||
- | * banquet price is fixed for 250 to 750 people at $75/person, no matter the size. | + | * banquet price is fixed for 250 to 750 people at $75/person, no matter the size. |
+ | |||
+ | === Questions to the organizers === | ||
+ | * //add bullet points with confusions and draft questions. | ||
=== Pro === | === Pro === | ||
Line 25: | Line 30: | ||
=== Space for your comments - especially what issues are most important to you (include name)=== | === Space for your comments - especially what issues are most important to you (include name)=== | ||
* //add your comments as bullet points. | * //add your comments as bullet points. | ||
+ | * Mike K: | ||
+ | * Pros: Pretty easy to get to by plane and a good connection to the airport. Staying in downtown is now more viable than during the 2013 meeting (gives a greater choice of hotels). Another good place for weather. The main hall used for plenary sessions at the 2013 meeting was great. The 2013 meeting worked reasonably well, though I recall a fair amount of walking across a long bridge. | ||
+ | * Cons: I think the repeated site is a con (I know where I'd go for a repeated site). In 2013 I recall some of the meeting rooms being too small (including a smallish auditorium in Tate(?) that required overflow rooms for at least one important session). | ||
+ | * (Prisca) Clarification on Fermilab' | ||
+ | * (Tom Diehl (FNAL)) Least expensive. Probably get the highest participation, | ||
+ | * (Roger Rusack - Minnesota) | ||
+ | * (Prisca) Quick response to Mike K: If you look at the proposal you see that the entire conference is on the East Bank campus now (no walking across the bridge unless you want to for the fun of it). The old Tate Physics is completely refurbished and there is a new Physics Nanotechnology Building, right across the street from the new Recreation and Wellness which has camps for kids and guest passes for adults. | ||
+ | * (Bob B) Breakout rooms: | ||