Campuses:
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| engineering:jan21_10 [2010/01/21 05:51] – prisca | engineering:jan21_10 [2010/01/21 09:39] (current) – prisca | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| * Lee will talk to Dufrane. Need a very rough cost per area coverage for water shield | * Lee will talk to Dufrane. Need a very rough cost per area coverage for water shield | ||
| * New Drawings need to go to DUSEL by Jan 29 - in time for review by larger collaboration for Feb 4 teleconf | * New Drawings need to go to DUSEL by Jan 29 - in time for review by larger collaboration for Feb 4 teleconf | ||
| - | * Prisca gone next week - Lee leads teleconference | + | |
| ==== Discussion for this week ==== | ==== Discussion for this week ==== | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
| * Summarize Lee and Bob's discussion wrt transfer of infrastructure into DUSEL format. | * Summarize Lee and Bob's discussion wrt transfer of infrastructure into DUSEL format. | ||
| * Summary of DuFrane discussion or beginning of a water shield cost estimate | * Summary of DuFrane discussion or beginning of a water shield cost estimate | ||
| + | * Lee spoke with Lou of Dufrane earlier this week | ||
| + | * January 2009 concept was: | ||
| + | * 10-ft wide x 12-ft long x 9-ft high | ||
| + | * 8-ft thick shielding on four sides | ||
| + | * 5-ft thick shielding on top and bottom | ||
| + | * Structural (carbon) steel support structure | ||
| + | * Shield segments slide in and out to provide access | ||
| + | * Quote was $2.785 million | ||
| + | * January 2010 concept | ||
| + | * Much larger internal space | ||
| + | * Labyrinth access | ||
| + | * Similar shielding thickness | ||
| + | * Structural (carbon) steel support undesirable | ||
| + | * Dufrane unwilling to provide quote or even SWAG at current level of consideration | ||
| + | * Scaling calcs underway | ||
| * Surface bldg vs Shallow site. re: decision by DUSEL not to develop 300' or 800' areas | * Surface bldg vs Shallow site. re: decision by DUSEL not to develop 300' or 800' areas | ||
| * Revisit concept drawings - what is still missing, what needs to be changed | * Revisit concept drawings - what is still missing, what needs to be changed | ||
| + | * Items due in one week | ||
| + | * Location of your experiment | ||
| + | * for physics experiments, | ||
| + | * Experiment installation drawing | ||
| + | * Establish the required footprint | ||
| + | * Identify all major subsystems | ||
| + | * Requirements and hazard identification | ||
| + | * Underground and surface spaces for fabrication, | ||
| + | * Major hazards and handling and mitigation plans should be identified | ||