Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
Assay and Acquisition of Radiopure Materials
engineering:water_shield_design_issues

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
engineering:water_shield_design_issues [2010/01/05 22:47] leepetersenengineering:water_shield_design_issues [2010/01/05 22:53] (current) leepetersen
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Water Shield Design Issues ====== ====== Water Shield Design Issues ======
  
 +  * {{:engineering:prelim_water_shield_12-22-09.pdf|Sketches and Calcs, referred to below}}
   * Stick-Built Construction vs. Modular Construction   * Stick-Built Construction vs. Modular Construction
     - Stick-Built construction -- The water shield would be constructed in place in the FAARM space, from components transported underground.     - Stick-Built construction -- The water shield would be constructed in place in the FAARM space, from components transported underground.
Line 19: Line 20:
     - The structural design of the water shield began by considering a 1.5m thick slice of the 9m roof span.  There was assumed to be no live load; and a 3 m water dead load acting over the entire roof.  The maximum moment was then found to calculate the maximum tensile stress in this roof beam.  This tensile stress was used to find the stress in the membrane material. (pdf page 2)     - The structural design of the water shield began by considering a 1.5m thick slice of the 9m roof span.  There was assumed to be no live load; and a 3 m water dead load acting over the entire roof.  The maximum moment was then found to calculate the maximum tensile stress in this roof beam.  This tensile stress was used to find the stress in the membrane material. (pdf page 2)
     - Due to possible construction difficulties of the corrugated modules, a modified non-corrugated design was considered (pdf page 4).  This design called for two layers of modules with offset joints.  This design introduced some particle trajectories with only 1.5m of water, and some with 0m (as shown on page 4).  This was also an issue with the existing hot cells (pdf page 5).     - Due to possible construction difficulties of the corrugated modules, a modified non-corrugated design was considered (pdf page 4).  This design called for two layers of modules with offset joints.  This design introduced some particle trajectories with only 1.5m of water, and some with 0m (as shown on page 4).  This was also an issue with the existing hot cells (pdf page 5).
- +    - For structural integrity, modules would need to be filled or emptied simultaneously with its neighbors.  Other issues are earthquake and sloshing loads, and the prevention of leaks.  Thermal effects on the modules could cause gap openings for particles.  Each module should have a high and low point for emptying, and for gasses.
-  * For structural integrity, modules would need to be filled or emptied simultaneously with its neighbors.  Other issues are earthquake and sloshing loads, and the prevention of leaks.  Thermal effects on the modules could cause gap openings for particles.  Each module should have a high and low point for emptying, and for gasses. +
- +
engineering/water_shield_design_issues.1262753264.txt.gz · Last modified: 2010/01/05 22:47 by leepetersen