Go to the U of M home page
School of Physics & Astronomy
PPPDT Wiki

User Tools


meetingsandtelecons:april10.08

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

meetingsandtelecons:april10.08 [2008/04/09 21:47] – created 71.195.59.133meetingsandtelecons:april10.08 [2008/04/09 21:55] (current) 71.195.59.133
Line 1: Line 1:
-==== Discussion Topics for Telecon of April 3, 2008 ====+==== Discussion Topics for Telecon of April 10, 2008 ====
  
-  * Update on decadal panel  +  * Release of Epic Report  
-  * Preparations for a future possible midex (Al Kogut) +  * Discussion of Strategy Statement
-  * Strategy for Decadal Panel+
  
-=== Update on Decadal Panel ===+=== Draft Strategy Statement ===
  
-Chuck Bennet explains the steps leading to the decadal panel: +The polarization of the cosmic microwave background radiation contains a wealth of information about the physics of the early universe, the growth of structures, and properties of the fundamental particles of physics. Much of this information is accessible only through detailed mapping of the CMB polarization. A polarization map of the galaxy at millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelengths also contains information about properties of galactic dust, sources of synchrotron radiation, and magnetic field strength and structure, all of which are of strong interest for the astrophysical community.  
 + 
 +We believe that the most effective way to probe the abundant cosmological and astrophysical information that is encoded in the polarization at these wavelengths is with a dedicated satellite. A CMB Polarization satellite would provide a full sky map of the CMB polarization, probing scales not accessible from the ground. It would have unprecedented sensitivity, a result of the absence of the atmosphere or a warm Telescope. It is widely acknowledged that the most critical component of a polarization experiment, namely the control of sources of systematic errors, can best be achieved on a satellite platform.  
 + 
 +The Primordial Polarization Program Definition Team and the scientists signed below endorse a program of technology development and sub-orbital experiments that will lead to a CMB Polarization satellite as soon as feasible. We urge NASA and other agencies to fund this program to its fullest. 
  
-  * The Space Studies Board (SSB) and the Board on Physics and Astronomy (BPA) guided the process that produced the internal proposal to initiate a decadal  survey.   (I was involved with this.)  This effort  included recommending the timing, size and scope of the survey.   
-  * The end result was the NRC proposal to NSF, NASA, and DOE. 
-  * The agencies then weigh in on whether the scope and broad outlines of the Decadal Survey is acceptable to them.  There is a lot of back and forth at this stage.  Questions and answers, proposed modifications, etc.  In the end, everyone (NASA, NSF, DOE, and the NRC) needs to agree on the broad outline, scope, and process before any funds flow.  That has not happened yet. 
-  * The National Research Council (NRC) will internally nominate people to serve on the Decadal Panel.  The nominations need to be approved internally at the highest levels of the National Academy. (The decadal panel is not selected by any of its boards) There are strict requirements on a number of balance and conflict-of-interest issues.  Balance means a lot of things (geographic, small-vs-big institutions, male/female, scientific sub-field, etc.).  No one closely associated with a project to be reviewed is likely to be selected.    
-  * Once the NRC convinces itself that it has a reasonably conflict-free panel that "looks like America" people will be invited to serve.  Some people will decline. 
  
 === Strategy for Decadal Panel: Recap === === Strategy for Decadal Panel: Recap ===
Line 19: Line 17:
 Two approaches that bracket the range of possibilities. Two approaches that bracket the range of possibilities.
  
-(a) While B-mode science is compelling, no case can be made for a satellite any time soon.+(a) While B-mode science is compelling, no case can be made for a satellite any time soon and perhaps never
  
 (b) A strong case for a satellite can and should be made to the decadal panel even as of today because the science return, even with a null detection, is compelling. Not only a satellite is justified, it is critical to the health of our field.  (b) A strong case for a satellite can and should be made to the decadal panel even as of today because the science return, even with a null detection, is compelling. Not only a satellite is justified, it is critical to the health of our field. 
meetingsandtelecons/april10.08.1207795671.txt.gz · Last modified: 2008/04/09 21:47 by 71.195.59.133